Moore v. Masto et al

Filing 165

ORDER Granting 164 Motion for Extension of Time. Replies due by 5/19/2023. The schedule for further proceedings set forth in the February 5, 2019, scheduling order ECF No. 51 will remain in effect. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/12/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)

1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5
6

RANDOLPH L. MOORE,
Petitioner,

7

ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(ECF NO. 164)

v.

8
9

Case No. 2:13-cv-0655-JCM-DJA

WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.

10
11
12

In this capital habeas corpus action, after a 120-day initial period following the

13

filing of Respondents’ answer, and then a 59-day extension of time and a 60-day

14

extension of time, Petitioner Randolph L. Moore, who is represented by appointed

15

counsel, was due to file a reply to the answer by May 5, 2023. See Order entered June

16

13, 2022 (ECF No. 157) (120 days for reply); Order entered January 9, 2023 (59-day

17

extension); Order entered March 6, 2023 (60-day extension).

18

On May 5, 2023, Moore filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 164),

19

requesting a further 14-day extension of time, to May 19, 2023, for his reply. Moore’s

20

counsel states that he needs this extension of time because of his obligations in other

21

cases. Moore’s counsel represents that Respondents do not oppose the motion for

22

extension of time.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time

2

(ECF No. 164) is GRANTED. Petitioner will have until and including May 19, 2023, to

3

file a reply to Respondents’ answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further

4

proceedings set forth in the February 5, 2019, scheduling order (ECF No. 51) will

5

remain in effect.

6
7

DATED May 12, 2023.

8
9

JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2