Holden v. Nevins et al

Filing 79

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner will have ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this order to file and serve a motion or notice indicating how petitioner wishes to proceed with this action. If counsel files a motion, then the normal briefing schedule of LR 7-2 will apply. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 JIM BASS HOLDEN, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 Case No. 2:13-cv-00668-JCM-GWF ORDER v. WARDEN DWIGHT NEVINS, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 This matter is before the court on the appointment of new counsel to represent petitioner. 17 18 ECF No. 78. New counsel will need to decide how to proceed with the case. Upon reviewing the petition, the court provisionally appointed the Federal Public 19 20 Defender to represent petitioner. ECF No. 5. The Federal Public Defender had a conflict of 21 interest and could not represent petitioner. ECF No. 6. The court then appointed William Gamage to represent petitioner. ECF No. 8. Gamage 22 23 filed a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 39. That is the operative 24 petition. Respondents have filed an answer. ECF No. 47. Petitioner did not file a reply to the 25 answer, and the first amended petition technically is briefed fully and ready for a decision on the 26 merits. 27 28 However, petitioner filed a proper-person motion for substitution of appointed counsel. ECF No. 59. Petitioner was not pleased that Gamage’s first amended petition contained only one 1 1 ground. Petitioner also stated that he could not communicate with Gamage. The court also 2 received information that Gamage had abandoned other clients in other actions. The court 3 granted petitioner’s proper-person. ECF No. 63. The court appointed Mary Lou Wilson to 4 represent petitioner. ECF No. 64. Wilson then filed a motion for leave to file a second amended 5 petition. ECF No. 71. The motion repeated petitioner’s complaints about Gamage, supported by 6 a newspaper article, court documents, and orders of the Nevada Supreme Court imposing 7 sanctions on Gamage. Id. The motion for leave to file a second amended petition is fully briefed 8 and ready for decision. 9 Wilson then resigned from the CJA panel and moved to withdraw. ECF No. 76. The 10 court granted Wilson’s motion. ECF No. 77. The court has appointed Theresa Ristenpart to 11 represent petitioner. ECF No. 78. 12 The court will give new counsel time to become familiar with the case. Counsel will need 13 to decide how to proceed with this action. To repeat, the first amended petition, ECF No. 39, still 14 is the operative petition, but petitioner is not pleased with that petition. The motion for leave to 15 file a second amended petition, ECF No. 71, still is pending. Counsel might wish to decide to 16 proceed with that motion and proposed amended petition. However, if counsel does choose to 17 proceed with that motion, then counsel will need to file a separate proposed second amended 18 petition, because Wilson included her proposed second amended petition within the motion 19 document itself and not as an attachment. See LR 15-1(a). Counsel might wish to withdraw the 20 currently pending motion, ECF No. 71, and file a new motion for leave to amend with a new 21 proposed second amended petition. Counsel might have another proposal, too. 22 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner will have ninety (90) days from the date of 23 entry of this order to file and serve a motion or notice indicating how petitioner wishes to proceed 24 with this action. If counsel files a motion, then the normal briefing schedule of LR 7-2 will apply. 25 DATED: March 7, 2019. 26 ______________________________ JAMES C. MAHAN United States District Judge 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?