Engel v. Siroky et al
Filing
57
ORDER DISMISSING CASE for Want of Subject-matter Jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/8/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Case No. 2:13-cv-672-JAD-PAL
Alan Engel,
Plaintiff
5
6
v.
7
Jan Siroky et al.,
Order Dismissing Case for Want of
Subject-matter Jurisdiction
Defendants
8
9
10
Alan “Ari” Engel is a professional poker player who claims that the defendants defrauded
11
him by making unauthorized use of his poker-tournament training facility, damaged his reputation
12
and his school’s value, left him unable to sell the school, and conspired to cause the entry of an
13
unauthorized money judgment against him in Las Vegas Justice Court.1 A sua sponte review of the
14
basis for federal jurisdiction in this case suggested that jurisdiction is lacking, and the court ordered
15
Engel to show cause by July 3, 2015, why this case should not be dismissed for want of subject-
16
matter jurisdiction.2 Engel did not respond to the order to show cause, and the court now dismisses
17
this case for the reasons expressed therein.
18
Accordingly, because plaintiff did not demonstrate to this court by July 3, 2015, that the
19
federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case based on either a federal question or
20
complete diversity of citizenship under the controlling legal principles, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
21
that this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. All pending
22
motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
23
DATED July 8, 2015
24
________________________________
_________________________
__
__
_
__
_
Jennifer A. Dorsey
nifer A. Dorsey
Do
United States District Judge
d St t Di t i t J d
25
26
27
28
1
Doc. 1, 54.
2
Doc. 56; FRCP 12(h)(3).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?