Engel v. Siroky et al

Filing 57

ORDER DISMISSING CASE for Want of Subject-matter Jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/8/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Case No. 2:13-cv-672-JAD-PAL Alan Engel, Plaintiff 5 6 v. 7 Jan Siroky et al., Order Dismissing Case for Want of Subject-matter Jurisdiction Defendants 8 9 10 Alan “Ari” Engel is a professional poker player who claims that the defendants defrauded 11 him by making unauthorized use of his poker-tournament training facility, damaged his reputation 12 and his school’s value, left him unable to sell the school, and conspired to cause the entry of an 13 unauthorized money judgment against him in Las Vegas Justice Court.1 A sua sponte review of the 14 basis for federal jurisdiction in this case suggested that jurisdiction is lacking, and the court ordered 15 Engel to show cause by July 3, 2015, why this case should not be dismissed for want of subject- 16 matter jurisdiction.2 Engel did not respond to the order to show cause, and the court now dismisses 17 this case for the reasons expressed therein. 18 Accordingly, because plaintiff did not demonstrate to this court by July 3, 2015, that the 19 federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case based on either a federal question or 20 complete diversity of citizenship under the controlling legal principles, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 21 that this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. All pending 22 motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 DATED July 8, 2015 24 ________________________________ _________________________ __ __ _ __ _ Jennifer A. Dorsey nifer A. Dorsey Do United States District Judge d St t Di t i t J d 25 26 27 28 1 Doc. 1, 54. 2 Doc. 56; FRCP 12(h)(3).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?