Farmer et al v. MGM Grand Hotel, LLC

Filing 58

ORDER Denying 39 Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RASHAUNDA FARMER AND DIANE ESON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC, d/b/a MGM ) GRAND HOTEL, CASINO AND THEME PARK, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:13-cv-00686-GMN-GWF ORDER 14 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions (#39), filed on March 24, 15 2014. Defendants filed their Response (#47) on April 10, 2014. The Court conducted a hearing in 16 this matter on May 7, 2014. 17 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION 18 The principal grounds for Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions is its allegation that Defendants 19 misidentified who employed the security officers who allegedly refused to allow Plaintiffs to enter 20 the Wet Republic pool area because of their race. That issue has been resolved by Order (#55) 21 which allowed Plaintiffs to file a second amended complaint adding FDR Management, LLC, d/b/a 22 AMG Management Group as a defendant in this case. The Court finds that the circumstances 23 relating to this issue do not justify the imposition of sanctions against Defendants. Plaintiffs failed 24 to set forth with any particularity in their motion the alleged grounds for imposing sanctions against 25 Defendants. Plaintiffs’ bare allegations of misrepresentations or other misconduct by Defendants, 26 without providing any reasonable detailed explanation of the same does not support a motion for 27 sanctions. Accordingly, 28 ... 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions (#39) is denied. 2 DATED this 6th day of June, 2014. 3 4 5 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?