Howard v. Foster et al

Filing 2

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, without prejudice. Clerk shall return a copy of application and complaint to plaintiff. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: plaintiff - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 REGINALD C. HOWARD, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 S. FOSTER, et al., 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:13-cv-0695-APG-GWF Case No. 2:13-cv-0695-APG-GWF 2:1-cv-0695-APG-GWF ORDER 15 16 Reginald C. Howard, who is incarcerated at the Southern Desert Correctional Center (SDCC) 17 in Nevada, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and submitted a pro se a 18 civil rights complaint (ECF No. 1-1). The application for pauper status is incomplete because 19 plaintiff failed to sign the acknowledgment and verification page of the application. 20 The court notes that, based on the face of the complaint, the claims are not in jeopardy of 21 being lost on the basis of the two-year limitations period imposed on civil rights claims. See Perez v. 22 Seevers, 869 F.2d 425, 426 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 860 (1989); Nev. Rev. 23 Stat. ยง 11.190(4)(e) . However, plaintiff is advised to act promptly to ensure no such issue arises. 24 Therefore, this action will be dismissed without prejudice to afford plaintiff the opportunity 25 to file another action with payment of the $350 filing fee or a completed and signed application to 26 proceed in forma pauperis. 1 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk shall return a copy of the application and complaint to plaintiff. 3 The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 4 Dated this 19th day of June, 2013. 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?