Burd v. Bank of New York Mellon
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 14 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/17/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
RACHEL BURD,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
Case No. 2:13-CV-00705-KJD-NJK
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
14
ORDER
Defendant.
15
16
Before the Court is Defendant Bank of New York Mellon’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss
17
(#14). Plaintiff Rachel Burd responded (#17) and Defendant replied (#18).
18
I. Procedural History
19
On June 12, 2013, this Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims under Federal Rule of Civil
20
Procedure 12(b)(6), but granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint which “satisfies the
21
particularity requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) or a wrongful foreclosure claim that
22
fulfills the plausibility standard outlined by Twombly.” (#11). In short, because of Plaintiff’s pro se
23
status, the Court explicitly outlined the standards and elements required, explained why Plaintiff
24
failed to meet those standards and elements, and then gave Plaintiff the opportunity to file an
25
amended complaint. Plaintiff then filed her First Amended Complaint (#13).
26
///
1
2
II. Analysis
Plaintiff either will not or cannot satisfy the pleading requirements under either Federal Rule
3
of Civil Procedure 8 or 9. In fact, Plaintiff insists on using Rule 8 as the relevant standard, despite the
4
Court’s lengthy explanation as to why Rule 9 governs her misrepresentation claims. Having already
5
exhaustively explained the standards and elements required in its previous Order (#11), the Court
6
declines to do so again. Plaintiff’s complaint has changed little, and wholly fails to meet the
7
standards articulated by the Court for the same reasons set out in the Court’s previous Order (#11).
8
III. Conclusion
9
10
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (#14) is HEREBY GRANTED.
DATED this 17th day of September 2013.
11
12
13
14
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?