Katynski v. Saint-Gobain Corp.

Filing 29

ORDER that the parties shall comply with the requirements of LR 10-5(b), and the Ninth Circuits decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/10/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11
12

ALLEN KATYNSKI,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CERTAINTEED GYPSUM MANUFACTURING, )
INC., et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:13-cv-00752-APG-PAL
ORDER

13
14

Before the court is the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. #26) which the court modified

15

and approved to facilitate discovery in this case. This order reminds counsel that there is a presumption

16

of public access to judicial files and records. A party seeking to file a confidential document under seal

17

must file a motion to seal and must comply with the Ninth Circuit’s directives in Kamakana v. City and

18

County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).

19

The court has adopted electronic filing procedures that, with a few exceptions not applicable

20

here, the Clerk of the Court no longer maintains paper records. Special Order 109 requires the Clerk of

21

the Court to maintain the official files for all cases filed on or after November 7, 2005, in electronic

22

form. The electronic record constitutes the official record of the court. Attorneys must file documents

23

under seal using the court’s electronic filing procedures. See LR 10-5(b). That rule provides:

24

Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior Court order, papers filed
with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a motion for leave to file
those documents under seal, and shall be filed in accordance with the Court’s
electronic filing procedures. If papers are filed under seal pursuant to prior
Court order, the papers shall bear the following notation on the first page,
directly under the case number: “FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO
COURT ORDER DATED __________.” All papers filed under seal will
remain sealed until such time as the Court may deny the motion to seal or

25
26
27
28

///

1

enter an order to unseal them, or the documents are unsealed pursuant to
Local Rule.

2
3

Id. Documents filed under seal are not accessible to the public.

4

The court has approved the parties’ blanket protective order to facilitate their discovery

5

exchanges. However, the parties have not shown, and court has not found, that any specific documents

6

are secret or confidential. The parties have not provided specific facts supported by affidavits or

7

concrete examples to establish that a protective order is required to protect any specific trade secret or

8

other confidential information pursuant to Rule 26(c) or that disclosure would cause an identifiable and

9

significant harm. The Ninth Circuit has held that there is a presumption of public access to judicial

10

files and records and that parties seeking to maintain the confidentiality of documents attached to non-

11

dispositive motions must show good cause exists to overcome the presumption of public access. See

12

Kamakana 447 F.3d at 1179. Parties seeking to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to

13

dispositive motions must show compelling reasons sufficient to overcome the presumption of public

14

access. Id. at 1180.

15
16
17

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the requirements of LR 10-5(b), and the
Ninth Circuit’s decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, with respect to any documents filed under seal.
Dated this 10th day of December, 2013.

18
19
20

________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2