Peck v. Nevin et al

Filing 18

ORDER that the Clerk shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copy of 11 Plaintiffs Complaint on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, attention Kat Howe. The Attorney Generals Office shall file a notice rega rding acceptance of service within 21 days. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named Defendant(s), such Defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within 60 days from the date of this order. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 FRANK M. PECK, 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., 10 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:13-cv-00782-GMN-CWH ORDER 11 12 This is an action on a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, removed from 13 state court. The complaint was previously screened by the Court. (ECF No. 10). The screening 14 order imposed a 90-day stay and the Court entered a subsequent order scheduling a mediation 15 conference. (ECF Nos. 10 & 14). The minutes from the mediation conference indicate that 16 settlement was not reached. (ECF No. 15). The Office of the Attorney General has filed a status 17 report informing the Court of its intent to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 17). 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 19 1. The Clerk shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff’s 20 complaint (ECF No. 11) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, 21 attention Kat Howe. 22 2. Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 10), within twenty-one (21) 23 days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a notice 24 advising the Court and plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it 25 accepts service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, 26 and (c) the names of the defendants for whom it is filing last-known-address 1 information under seal. As to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney 2 General’s Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last 3 known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such information. 4 3. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plaintiff shall file a 5 motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and 6 specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to 7 which the Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information, 8 plaintiff shall provide the full name and address for the defendant(s). 9 4. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such 10 defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within 11 sixty (60) days from the date of this order. 12 5. Henceforth, plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been 13 entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other 14 document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the 15 original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct 16 copy of the document was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If 17 counsel has entered a notice of appearance, the plaintiff shall direct service to the 18 individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the address stated therein. 19 The Court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge 20 which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper received by a district judge, 21 magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate showing proper 22 service. 23 Dated this 18th day of November, 2013. 24 25 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?