Parrish v. Williams et al
Filing
11
ORDER Denying 7 Motion to Reopen Case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue given that jurists of reason would not find the decision to dismiss the action and to deny the motion to reopen debatable. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/22/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
DARNELL PARRISH,
11
Petitioner,
12
vs.
13
BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
14
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:13-cv-0836-JCM-VCF
ORDER
15
16
17
18
Darnell Parrish, a pro se prisoner, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and filed
an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1).
The court denied his application and ordered petitioner to pay the $5 filing fee by June 17,
19
2013. ECF No. 4. That time expired with no receipt of payment being provided on the docket. The
20
matter was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee on July 15, 2013. ECF No. 5.
21
Petitioner now moves the court to reopen his case (ECF No. 7), providing documentation
22
showing that he diligently attended to the payment of the fee by immediately processing a brass slip
23
for payment to the court and that the payment was purportedly processed for payment to the court on
24
or about June 11, 2013. The court has been unable, however, to confirm receipt of payment of the
25
fee. Meanwhile, petitioner has filed a notice of appeal.
26
Because there is no record that payment was actually received by the court and because the
1
dismissal was without prejudice, the motion to reopen shall be denied.
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED the motion to reopen (ECF No. 7) is DENIED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue given that
4
jurists of reason would not find the decision to dismiss the action and to deny the motion to reopen
5
debatable.
6
Dated this 22nd day of October, 2013.
_____
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?