McCrae et al v. Medicare et al

Filing 12

ORDER Granting 11 Motion for Hearing. A Status Conference is scheduled for 8/15/2013 at 08:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/22/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MTN DAVID F. SAMPSON, ESQ., Nevada Bar No. 6811 LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON 200 E. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89104 Tel: 702-605-1099 Fax: 888-209-4199 Email: david@davidsampsonlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 STEVE MCCRAE and THE LAW OFFICE ) OF DAVID SAMPSON, LLC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) SILMO MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, ) NEVADA SPINE CLINIC, ) NEVADA MEDICAID, LAS VEGAS ) PHARMACY, SMOKE RANCH SURGERY ) CENTER, MEDICARE, STEVE ) CARUSO, ESQ., NEVADA IMAGING, ) LIBERTY MUTUAL DOES I - X, ) and ROE CORPORATIONS I - X, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ________________________________ ) Case No: 2-13-cv-858 MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, STEVE MCCREA AND THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON, by and through DAVID F. SAMPSON, ESQ, of the LAW OFFICE OF DAVID 26 SAMPSON and hereby move, pursuant to LR 22-2 for a scheduling conference in this matter. 27 28 DATED THIS 2nd day of July, 2013. 1 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 22-2 the Plaintiff is required to file a motion requesting a 3 settlement conference in an interpleader action. The motion must be filed within 30 days after 4 5 the first Defendant appears. Defendant Medicare files its Answer on June 6, 2013. 6 This action involves a settlement on behalf of Steve McCrae in an underlying claim in 7 the amount of $15,000.00, which was the full insurance policy limit applicable to the underlying 8 claim. The funds are currently being held by the clerk of the Eighth Judicial District Court, 9 10 State of Nevada. The Defendants have various claims to the said funds. Additionally, THE 11 LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON, LLC., had a claim for attorney fees and costs. Given 12 the sums of monies to which the various parties claim they are entitled, it is clear $15,000.00 is 13 nowhere near sufficient to satisfy the liens asserted in this matter. This action was therefore 14 filed. 15 16 It appears the only claimants which have any likelihood of collecting any portion of the 17 $15,000.00 policy limit are Mr. McCrae’s attorneys, and Medicare. 18 recommends this action be resolved by paying McCrae’s attorneys, and giving the balance of 19 Plaintiff therefore any monies to Medicare. In any event, a scheduling conference is necessary. 20 Plaintiffs sent notice of a settlement conference, and convened the same on July 2, 2013. 21 22 Attending were David Sampson, Esq., for his office, Steven Caruso, Esq., for his office, and 23 Troy Flake on behalf of Medicare. It was agreed by all who attended that the attorney’s lien 24 should be fully satisfied, and the remainder of the funds should be paid to Medicare. The parties 25 26 27 28 will seek a stipulation from the Court for an Order regarding the same. 1 2 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons Plaintiffs move for a scheduling conference, or in the 3 alternative that the Court recognize the conference held on July 2, 2013. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BY:___//ss// David Sampson _________ DAVID F. SAMPSON, ESQ., LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON PO Box 750373 Las Vegas, NV 89136 Tel: 702-605-1099 Fax: 888-209-4199 Attorney for Plaintiff 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Status Conference is GRANTED, and a Status Conference is scheduled for Thursday, August 15, 2013, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 3B. Dated this 22nd day of July, 2013. _______________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?