Sexton et al v. Hawkins

Filing 58

ORDER Granting 57 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to 56 Motion for Judgment (First Request). IT IS SO ORDERED that the United States (the defendant) may have an extension of time through 12/23/15, in which to respond to the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and that the plaintiffs may have an extension of time through 1/12/16, in which to file their reply. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/22/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
1 CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 3 4 5 6 W. CARL HANKLA Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Dept. of Justice PO Box 683 Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 307-6448 Fax: (202) 307-0054 w.carl.hankla@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States of America 7 8 DANIEL G. BOGDEN U.S. Attorney, District of Nevada Of Counsel 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 JAMES C. SEXTON JR. and ESQUIRE GROUP LLC, Plaintiffs, Civil No. 2:13-cv-00893-JCM-(VCF) v. KAREN L. HAWKINS, Director of Office of Professional Responsibility, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond and Reply Re Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (First Request) 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the plaintiffs and by the defendant 2 (the United States of America) that, with respect to the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 3 filed by the plaintiffs on November 9, 2015: 4 1. The United States may have an extension of time to December 23, 2015 in which to file and serve its response. 5 2. 6 The plaintiffs may have an extension of time to January 12, 2016 in which 7 to file and serve their reply. 8 The reason for the extensions is to allow time for government counsel to consult with 9 agency counsel from the office of the Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, before filing the 10 United States’ response, and to allow time for plaintiffs to file their reply after the holiday 11 season. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED this 18th day of November, 2015. CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO Acting Assistant Attorney General /s/ W. Carl Hankla W. CARL HANKLA Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 307-6448 w.carl.hankla@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States of America DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada Of Counsel 2 1 DATED this 18th day of November, 2015. 2 /s/ Desa Ballard DESA BALLARD Ballard & Watson P.O. Box 6338 West Columbia, South Carolina 29171 Telephone: (803) 796-9299 Fax: (803) 796-1066 Email: desab@desaballard.com SHAWN R. PEREZ Law Office of Shawn R. Perez 633 So. Fourth Street, Suite 7 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 485-3977 Email: shawn711@msn.com Attorneys for James C. Sexton, Jr. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 /s/ Puoy K. Premsrirut PUOY K. PREMSRIRUT Brown Brown & Premsrirut 520 So. Fourth Street, Second Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 384-5563 Fax: (702) 385-1752 Email: puoy@brownlawlv.com Attorney for Esquire Group LLC 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED that the United States (the defendant) may have an extension of 16 time through December 23, 2015 in which to respond to the Motion for Judgment on the 17 Pleadings, and that the plaintiffs may have an extension of time through January 12, 2016 in 18 which to file their reply. 19 20 _______________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge 21 DATED: 22 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that service of the foregoing has been made by the Court’s CM/ECF system to: DESA BALLARD desab@desaballard.com Attorney for James C. Sexton Jr. SHAWN R. PEREZ Shawn711@msn.com Attorney for James C. Sexton Jr. PUOY K. PREMSRIRUT puoy@brownlawlv.com Attorney for Esquire Group LLC /s/ W. Carl Hankla W. CARL HANKLA Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?