Sexton et al v. Hawkins

Filing 66

ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' 65 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant's 59 Response due 01/19/2016. Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's 64 Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/19/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 01/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 SHAWN R. PEREZ (SBN 10421) Law Office of Shawn R. Perez 633 South Fourth Street, Suite 7 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 485-3977 Facsimile (702) 383-6603 Email: shawn711@msn.com 8 DESA BALLARD (SC BN 00498) Ballard & Watson Post Office Box 6338 West Columbia, South Carolina 29171 Telephone (803) 796-9299 Facsimile (803) 796-1066 Email: desab@desaballard.com 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMES C. SEXTON JR. 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JAMES C. SEXTON JR. and ESQUIRE GROUP LLC, Plaintiffs, vs Case No. 2:13-cv-00893-JAD-VCF KAREN L. HAWKINS, Director of Office Of Professional Responsibility, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury, Defendant 17 18 19 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Reply to Opposition to Motion (Docket entry # 59) and Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket entry # 61) 20 21 22 23 (First Request) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the plaintiffs and by the defendant (the United States of America) that: 1 1. The plaintiffs may have an extension of time to January 19, 2016 in which to file and 2 serve its reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the 3 Pleadings (docket entry #59). 4 2. The plaintiffs may have an extension of time to January 19, 2016 in which to file and 5 serve their response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry # 61) 6 The reason for the extensions is that plaintiff’s counsel is recovering from recent surgery, 7 and the deadline set for plaintiff’s response to docket entry # 61 was initially scheduled for a 8 weekend day, and is being moved to the first regular business day thereafter. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED this 11th day of January, 2016. DESA BALLARD Ballard & Watson P.O. Box 6338 West Columbia, South Carolina 29171 Telephone: (803) 796-9299 Fax: (803) 796-1066 Email: desab@desaballard.com Attorneys for James C. Sexton, Jr. SHAWN R. PEREZ Law Office of Shawn R. Perez 633 So. Fourth Street, Suite 7 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 485-3977 Email: shawn711@msn.com Attorney for James C. Sexton, Jr. PUOY K. PREMSRIRUT Brown Brown & Premsrirut 520 So. Fourth Street, Second Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 384-5563 Fax: (702) 385-1752 Email: puoy@brownlawlv.com Attorney for Esquire Group LLC 2 1 DATED this 11th day of January, 2016. 2 CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO Acting Assistant Attorney General 3 W. CARL HANKLA Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 307-6448 w.carl.hankla@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States of America 4 5 6 7 8 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada Of Counsel 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED that 13 1. Plaintiffs may have an extension of time through January 19, 2016 in which to reply to 14 Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (docket entry 15 # 59); and 16 17 2. Plaintiffs may have an extension of time through January 19, 2016 in which to file their response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry # 61). 18 19 20 21 22 _____________________ _______________________________ CHARD BOULWARE, RICHARD F. BOULWARE II United States District Judge DATED: 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that service of the foregoing has been made by the Court’s 3 CM/ECF system to: 4 5 CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO 6 W. CARL HANKLA 7 DANIEL G. BOGDEN 8 Attorneys for the United States of America 9 10 11 s/ Desa Ballard DESA BALLARD Attorney for James C. Sexton, Jr. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?