Gibbs et al v. Rivers Transportation Group, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER that 24 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order is DENIED without prejudice. The parties shall submit a revised discovery plan, no later than August 29, 2013, that complies with the Local Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 WILLIAM GIBBS and JOHN WAGNER, 16 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 2:13-cv-0935-RCJ-NJK ) vs. ) ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY PLAN ) (Docket No. 24) RIVERS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling order (Docket 17 No. 24), which is hereby DENIED without prejudice. The parties shall submit a revised discovery plan, 18 no later than August 29, 2013, that complies with the Local Rules. Specifically, the parties are 19 requesting a discovery period approximately 30 days longer than the typical 180 days from when the 20 first defendant answered. Therefore, the parties must provide “a statement of the reasons why longer or 21 different time periods should apply to the case . . .” See LR 26-1(d). 11 12 13 14 15 22 Additionally, it is the Court’s preference that the parties specify that all requests to extend 23 discovery deadlines must comply with LR 26-4. Under LR 26-4, requests to extend discovery 24 deadlines must be filed at least 21 days before the expiration of the subject deadline sought to be 25 extended. LR 26-4. A request made after the expiration of the subject deadline shall not be granted 26 unless the movant demonstrates that the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect. 27 ... 28 ... 1 Although the Court is inclined to approve the deadlines set out in the parties’ proposed 2 discovery plan, the parties must comply with the Local Rules and must provide sufficient reasons for 3 their delayed filing and extended deadlines. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: August 26, 2013 6 7 8 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?