Cox v. Carr et al
Filing
9
ORDER that #8 Order is partially vacated. FURTHER ORDERED that #3 MOTION to to File Electronically is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/10/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
CRYSTAL L. COX,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DAVID CARR, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-00938-APG-GWF
ORDER
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on the Court’s Order (#8) denying Plaintiff’s
15
Application to proceed in forma pauperis (#1) and granting her Motion to File Electronically (#3),
16
entered on December 6, 2013. It has come to the Court’s attention that the District Judge in
17
Randazza v. Cox, case no. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, revoked Plaintiff’s ability to file
18
electronically in that case due to significant and repeated violations of the Local Rules. See
19
Randazza, Doc. #144. In light of that order, this Court will vacate the subject Order (#8) in this
20
case to the extent that it granted Plaintiff’s Motion to File Electronically (#3). Accordingly,
21
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s December 6, 2013 Order (#8) is partially
vacated as follows:
23
(1)
24
To the extent that it granted Plaintiff’s Motion to File Electronically (#3), the Order
(#8) is vacated.
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to File Electronically (#3) is denied
2
without prejudice. In the event the District Court in Randazza v. Cox, case no. 2:12-cv-02040-
3
GMN-PAL, restores Plaintiff’s ability to file electronically, Plaintiff may re-file a motion to file
4
electronically in this case.
5
DATED this 10th day of December, 2013.
6
7
8
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?