Cox v. Carr et al

Filing 9

ORDER that #8 Order is partially vacated. FURTHER ORDERED that #3 MOTION to to File Electronically is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/10/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11
12

CRYSTAL L. COX,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DAVID CARR, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:13-cv-00938-APG-GWF
ORDER

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on the Court’s Order (#8) denying Plaintiff’s

15

Application to proceed in forma pauperis (#1) and granting her Motion to File Electronically (#3),

16

entered on December 6, 2013. It has come to the Court’s attention that the District Judge in

17

Randazza v. Cox, case no. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, revoked Plaintiff’s ability to file

18

electronically in that case due to significant and repeated violations of the Local Rules. See

19

Randazza, Doc. #144. In light of that order, this Court will vacate the subject Order (#8) in this

20

case to the extent that it granted Plaintiff’s Motion to File Electronically (#3). Accordingly,

21
22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s December 6, 2013 Order (#8) is partially
vacated as follows:

23

(1)

24

To the extent that it granted Plaintiff’s Motion to File Electronically (#3), the Order
(#8) is vacated.

25

...

26

...

27

...

28

...

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to File Electronically (#3) is denied

2

without prejudice. In the event the District Court in Randazza v. Cox, case no. 2:12-cv-02040-

3

GMN-PAL, restores Plaintiff’s ability to file electronically, Plaintiff may re-file a motion to file

4

electronically in this case.

5

DATED this 10th day of December, 2013.

6
7
8

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2