Satico Bay LLC Series 4930 Miners Ridge v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 19

ORDER Denying 18 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Parties shall submit a revised Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by 8/16/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/9/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9

16

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
Case No. 2:13-cv-0940-GMN-NJK
)
vs.
)
ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY PLAN
)
(Docket No. 18)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TRUSTEE
)
CORPS; AND DAVID C. SCHUBERT,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan (Docket No. 18), which is

17

hereby DENIED. The parties shall submit a revised discovery plan, no later than August 16, 2013, that

18

complies with the Local Rules. Specifically, the parties are requesting a significantly longer discovery

19

period than 180 days from when the first defendant answered, and thus the Discovery Plan must state

20

reasons why the longer time period should apply. LR 26-1(d).

10
11
12
13
14
15

SATICO BAY LLC SERIES 4930
MINERS RIDGE,

21

Further, the Rule 26(f) conference was required to be held within 30 days of May 28, 2013,

22

when the first Defendant appeared, and the stipulated discovery plan was due 14 days thereafter. See

23

Local Rule 26-1(d). Absent a motion to stay, which was neither filed nor granted by the Court, the

24

Discovery Plan is approximately one month late.

25

Finally, requests to extend discovery deadlines must be filed at least 21 days before the

26

expiration of the subject deadline sought to be extended. LR 26-4. The pending proposed discovery

27

plan omits reference to LR 26-4.

28

...

1

Although the Court is inclined to approve the deadlines set out in the parties’ proposed

2

discovery plan, the parties must comply with the Local Rules and must provide sufficient reasons for

3

their delayed filing and extended deadlines. In the future, the Court expects counsel to strictly comply

4

with the deadlines set out in Local Rule 26-1(d).

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

DATED: August 9, 2013

7
8
9

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2