United States of America v. $1,002,327.00 in United States Currency et al

Filing 63

ORDER Granting 60 Motion to Amend Complaint. Amended Complaint Shall Be Filed Within 7 Days of the Entry of This Order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 11 Case No. 2:13-CV-947 JCM (GWF) ORDER v. $1,002,327.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, et al., Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is plaintiff United States of America’s (hereinafter “plaintiff”) 14 15 16 17 motion to amend complaint. (Doc. # 60). Claimants Charles Burton Ritchie, Stephanie Ritchie, Benjamin Galecki, and ZIW, LLC (collectively “claimants”) filed a response. (Doc. # 61). Plaintiff did not file a reply, and the deadline to reply has now passed. In their response to plaintiff’s motion, claimants state that they have no objection to the 18 19 20 21 granting of plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. # 61). Further, the court finds that the reasoning set forth in plaintiff’s motion supports allowing plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff attaches a proposed amended complaint to its motion in accordance with Local Rule 15-1(a). (Doc. # 60-1). Accordingly, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff United States 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge of America’s motion to amend complaint, (doc. # 60), be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. ... ... ... 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file its amended complaint, (doc. # 60-1), on the docket within seven (7) days of the entry of this order. DATED March 30, 2015. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?