U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Banc de Binary, Ltd.

Filing 165

ORDER Granting 164 Stipulation Further Extending Stay of Action Pending Proposed Settlement. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
Case 2:13-cv-00992-MMD-VCF Document 164 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 5 Kathleen Banar, Chief Trial Attorney (IL Bar No. 6200597) Margaret Aisenbrey, Trial Attorney (Mo Bar No. 59560) Kim Bruno, Trial Attorney (District of Columbia Bar No.: 389899) U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1155 21 St. NW Washington, DC 20581 kbanar@cftc.gov, maisenbrey@cftc.gov (202) 418-5335 (202) 418-5987 (facsimile) Blaine T. Welsh (NV Bar No. 4790) Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office 333 Las Vegas Boulevard, Suite 5000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 blaine.welsh@usdoj.gov (702) 388-6336 (702) 388-6787 (facsimile) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. BANC DE BINARY LTD., E.T. BINARY OPTIONS LTD., BO SYSTEMS LTD., BDB SERVICES LTD., and OREN SHABAT LAURENT (a/k/a OREN SHABAT AND OREN COHEN) . Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-00992-MMD-VCF STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION PENDING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Case 2:13-cv-00992-MMD-VCF Document 164 Filed 12/30/15 Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) and Defendants Banc de Binary, Ltd. (“BdB Ltd.”), E.T. Binary Options, Ltd. (“ETBO”), BO Systems, Ltd. (“BO Systems”), BDB Services, Ltd. (“BDB Services”), and Oren Laurent (a/k/a Oren Shabat and Oren Cohen) (“Laurent”) (collectively, “Defendants”), have reported to the Court that they have reached a settlement in principle that would resolve this action and the action SEC v. Banc de Binary Ltd et al., Case No. 2:13-cv-00993-RCJ-VCF (the “SEC Action”). WHEREAS the parties to this action and the parties to the CFTC Action have executed a Term Sheet re: Proposed Global Settlement, dated August 27, 2015, reflecting the terms of their proposed agreement in principle (the “Proposed Global Settlement”); WHEREAS, the Proposed Global Settlement is subject to approval by both the CFTC and the SEC Commissioners; WHEREAS, the Court approved and ordered the requested stay, staying the action until October 23, 2015 unless a party filed a notice to lift that stay [DE # 161]; WHEREAS, the parties previously agreed to extend the stay, subject to Court approval, to continue the process of finalizing the settlement documents and obtaining Commission approval [DE # 162]; WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation, staying the action until December 31, 2015, unless a party filed a notice to lift that stay [DE # 163]; WHEREAS, because the parties have made substantial progress toward finalizing the governing documents for the Proposed Global Settlement, the parties have agreed to stay the action further, subject to the Court’s approval, for an additional six weeks, so that the parties can finish finalizing the settlement documents (including those needed for foreign jurisdictions), so counsel for the CFTC can recommend the settlement to the CFTC Commissioners, and so the parties can file, if approved by the CFTC Commissioners, any resulting final settlement papers; and Case 2:13-cv-00992-MMD-VCF Document 164 Filed 12/30/15 Page 3 of 5 WHEREAS the parties to the SEC Action are simultaneously filing a similar proposed stipulation and order to stay the SEC Action, with the same duration; WHEREAS, the Court entered an order on August 11, 2015 finding that Defendants violated the Consent Preliminary Injunction [DE # 24] and awarded attorney fees [DE # 152]; FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH ABOVE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among counsel for the parties as follows: 1. This action is stayed until February 8, 2016. 2. Before February 8, 2016, this stay shall be lifted without further action by the Court upon the filing of a notice by any party to lift the stay, at which point the litigation shall immediately resume on the date of that notice, with the parties restored to their respective positions as of the date of this stipulation. No party can challenge or dispute the filing of a notice to lift the stay by another party. To the extent the stay is lifted by such notice by a party, the Defendants’ response to the CFTC’s pending summary judgment motion [DE # 146] and the CFTC’s petition for attorney fees shall be due four days after the notice is filed. Moreover, within five business days of the filing of a party’s notice to lift the stay, the parties agree to jointly request a status conference with the Court to address the remaining pretrial and trial schedule. 3. If the CFTC Commissioners do not approve a settlement or a final settlement is not otherwise reached, with all definitive final documents filed with the Court, by February 8, 2016, then the litigation shall resume on that day, without further action of the Court, with the parties restored to their respective positions as of the date of this stipulation. The Defendants’ response to the CFTC’s pending summary judgment motion [DE # 146] shall be due February 8, 2016. Moreover, on or before February 12, 2016, the parties also agree to jointly request a status conference with the Court to address the remaining pretrial and trial schedule. Case 2:13-cv-00992-MMD-VCF Document 164 Filed 12/30/15 Page 4 of 5 December 30, 2015 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION By: /s/ Kathleen Banar Kathleen Banar (202) 418-5335 (202) 418-5987 facsimile kbanar@cftc.gov (Ill. Bar No. 6200597) Margaret Aisenbrey (816) 960-7749 (816) 960-7751 facsimile maisenbrey@cftc.gov (Mo. Bar No. 59560) Kim G. Bruno (202) 418-5368 (202) 418-5987 facsimile kbruno@cftc.gov (DC. Bar No.389899) U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1155 21st Street NW Washington, D.C. 20581 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS BANC DE BINARY LTD., ET BINARY OPTIONS LTD., BO SYSTEMS LTD., BDB SERVICES LTD., AND OREN SHABAT LAURENT (A/K/A OREN SHABAT AND OREN COHEN) By: __/s/ Jeff Ifrah_________ A. Jeff Ifrah jeff@ifrahlaw.com Rachel Hirsch rhirsch@ifrahlaw.com IFRAH PLLC 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue Suite 650 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: 202-524-4140 Facsimile: 202-521-4141 Craig S. Denney Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, NV 89501 775-785-5440 (office) 775-785-5411 (direct) 775-785-5441 (fax) cdenney@swlaw.com (NV Bar No. 6953) SO ORDERED: December 30, 2015 ______________ DATE _________________________________ THE HONORABLE MIRANDA DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:13-cv-00992-MMD-VCF Document 164 Filed 12/30/15 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 30, 2015, I electronically filed the STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION PENDING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system and thereby caused service of the foregoing document via electronic notice on all parties and counsel of record. /s/ Margaret P. Aisenbrey Attorney for the Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?