Securities & Exchange Commission v. Banc de Binary Ltd.
Filing
91
ORDER granting 79 , 80 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 78 Motion to Seal 80 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BANC DE BINARY LTD. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________________ )
2:13-cv-00993-RCJ-VCF
ORDER
12
13
This case arises out of the alleged trading of unregistered securities. The Court has
14
entered a preliminary injunction, ruling that although they are not in fact options, the “binary
15
options” Defendant is alleged to sell are “securities” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
16
as amended. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment against three Defendants and to seal
17
certain portions of that motion and supporting documents. Those three Defendants have filed a
18
non-opposition but have argued in a footnote that they remain “free to controvert facts that would
19
have been deemed admitted if the parties were proceeding by stipulation.” In reply, Plaintiff has
20
amended its proposed order to include additional declarations directed to certain issues. The
21
Court will grant the motion for summary judgment (and the motion to seal) but will not include
22
the additional declarations requested by Plaintiff in the amended proposed order attached to the
23
reply brief. The parties may argue the effect of the grant of the present motion in subsequent
24
proceedings. Defendants in agreeing to the grant of the present motion have taken their chances
25
that certain arguments will later be determined to have been waived. The Court need not address
1
those issues now. It is enough that Defendants have failed to oppose the present motion and have
2
in fact explicitly agreed to its grant.
3
4
5
6
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 79, 80) is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Seal (ECF No. 78) is GRANTED. In
7
accordance with the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 69), the following sealed versions of
8
the relevant documents shall remain under seal until such time as the Court may enter an order to
9
unseal them or they are otherwise unsealed under the Local Rules:
10
11
1. the SEC’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 80-1);
12
2. the supporting declaration of John. W. Berry (ECF No. 80-3); and
13
3. the SEC’s Statement of Uncontroverted Facts under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(1) and Local
14
Rule 56-1 (ECF No. 80-2).
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated this 28th day of October, 2014.
17
18
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?