Gordon v. Hughes et al

Filing 53

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 52 Request for a 60 Day Extension is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to re-file her motion, she shall inform the Court of the efforts made to meet and confer with Defendant's counsel to try to resolve this issue without Court action. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 04/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 STEPHANIE GORDON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HOME DEPOT, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No.: 2:13-cv-01072-JAD-GWF ORDER 13 14 15 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Request for a 60 Day Extension (#52), filed on April 12, 2016. Plaintiff requests a “60 day extension to be able to provide the opposing party all of the 17 requested documentation that they’ve asked for.” Motion (#52). Based solely on this 18 representation, the Court is unable to determine what deadline Plaintiff is seeking to extend. 19 Furthermore, Plaintiff has failed to indicate whether she has conferred with Defendant’s counsel to 20 see if Defendant would agree upon the requested extension. See Local Rule 26-7(b). Accordingly, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Request for a 60 Day Extension (#52)is denied 22 without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to re-file her motion, she shall inform the Court of the efforts 23 made to meet and confer with Defendant’s counsel to try to resolve this issue without Court action. 24 DATED this 14th day of April, 2016. 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?