Gordon v. Hughes et al

Filing 8

ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Set Aside the Judgment. The Clerk shall set aside 5 Order Dismissing Case and 6 Clerk's Judgment. Amended Complaint deadline: 10/22/2014. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/2/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 STEPHANIE GORDON, 10 11 12 CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-1072-JAD-GWF Plaintiff, vs. ORDER JEFF HUGHES, et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 On January 15, 2014, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims without prejudice for failure to 16 state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Doc. 3. Plaintiff was given until February 13, 17 2014, to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in the order; she filed none. 18 On July 11, 2014, I dismissed the case, and judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. Id. 19 Plaintiff now moves to set aside the judgment. Doc. 7. She represents that she never 20 received the order directing amendment and wants an opportunity to continue to litigate this case. 21 Id. I liberally construe this as a motion for relief from the judgment under Rule 60(b) and grant it. 22 Rule 60(b) permits a court to relieve a party from a final judgment, order, or proceeding if 23 the movant can demonstrate: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly 24 discovered evidence; (3) fraud; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied; or 25 (6) any other reason justifying relief from the judgment. Stewart v. Dupnik, 243 F.3d 549, 549 26 (9th Cir. 2000). The rule is “remedial in nature and . . . must be liberally applied.” TCI Group 27 Life Ins. Plan v. Knoebber, 244 F.3d 691, 696 (9th Cir. 2001). “Determining whether neglect is 28 1 excusable requires a court to balance ‘the danger or prejudice to the [other party], the length of 2 the delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings, the reason for the delay,. . . and 3 whether the movant acted in good faith.’” Uche-Uwakwe v. Shinseki, 349 F. App’x 136, 138 (9th 4 Cir. 2009) (quoting Briones v. Riviera Hotel & Casino, 116 F.3d 379, 381 (9th Cir. 1997)). Having considered each of these factors, I find excusable neglect that justifies setting 5 6 aside the judgment. Although plaintiff waited seven months from the order directing amendment 7 to file the instant motion, she explains that she never received that order or the court’s ultimate 8 dismissal order. Doc. 7. She claims she learned of the disposition from an attorney on July 30, 9 2014; she filed her motion for relief nine days later. Id. The motion was made “within a 10 reasonable time” as Rule 60(c) requires and, in any event, far less than a year after the entry of 11 judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) & (c). It appears that the length of the delay was not excessive in 12 light of the circumstances, and, taking plaintiff at her word, I see nothing to cause me to conclude 13 that she did not act in good faith. I also do not see any danger or true prejudice to the defendants 14 if the judgment is unwound and I renew plaintiff’s opportunity to file an amended complaint if 15 she can cure the deficiencies identified in the dismissal order. When I overlay these 16 considerations with the policy favoring deciding cases on their merits, I conclude that the motion 17 should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to set aside the judgment 18 19 [#7] is GRANTED; The Clerk of Court is instructed to set aside the judgment in favor of defendants [#6] 20 21 and the order dismissing the case [#5]; 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has until October 22, 2014, to file an 23 amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified in the dismissal order [#3].1 Plaintiff is 24 cautioned that her failure to file a timely and proper amended complaint in full compliance with 25 the rules of this court and the instructions in the order [#3] may result in the dismissal of this case 26 with prejudice and without additional prior notice. 27 28 1 Plaintiff has a copy of this order; she attached it to the instant motion. Doc. 7 at 5. 2 1 2 3 The Clerk of Court is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of this order at plaintiff’s record address. Dated: October 2, 2014. 4 JENNIFER A. DORSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?