Mitchell et al v. City of Henderson, Nevada et al
ORDER Granting 117 Stipulation to Extend (Second Request) Response Deadline re 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/10/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:13-cv-01154-APG-CWH Document 117 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 2
1 CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
2 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13255
3 POTTER LAW OFFICES
1125 Shadow Lane
4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Ph: (702) 385-1954
5 Fax: (702) 385-9081
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10 ANTHONY MITCHELL, LINDA
MITCHELL, and MICHAEL MITCHELL,
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS,
14 NEVADA; JOSEPH CHRONISTER,
individually and in his official capacity as
15 Chief of the North Las Vegas Police
Department; MICHAEL WALLER, DREW
16 ALBERS, DAVID CAWTHORN, ERIC
ROCKWELL, F/N/U SNYDER,
17 individually and in their official capacities
as North Las Vegas Police Officers;
18 JANETTE R. REYER-SPEER; DOE
individuals 1-40, jointly and severally; and
19 ROE CORPORATIONS 1-40, jointly and
Case No.: 2:13-cv-01154-APG-CWH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
COMES NOW, the above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel
23 of record, and hereby agree, jointly stipulate that the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’
24 Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 111] filed on September 22, 2016, currently due January
25 3, 2017, be extended an additional seven (7) days up to and including Tuesday, January 10,
Although Plaintiffs’ counsel has been actively working on responding to Defendants’
28 Motion, Plaintiffs’ counsel has been unable to complete the Response. Since the filing of the
Case 2:13-cv-01154-APG-CWH Document 117 Filed 01/03/17 Page 2 of 2
1 first Stipulation and Order to Extend Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
2 Judgment,[ECF 114], Plaintiffs’ counsel has had eleven (11) depositions, Plaintiffs’ counsel
3 has been preparing for a Jury Trial set to commence on January 3, 2017 in Donna Swigers, et
4 al. v. Mandalay Corp, et al., case number A-14-701182-C, which was vacated and re-set for
5 March 13, 2017, five (5) 9th Circuit Briefs due before January 1, 2017, and numerous
6 substantive motions and responses; as well as other general appearances and deadlines.
This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Response be extended an
9 additional seven (7) days up to and including Tuesday, January 10, 2017.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.
11 DATED this 3rd day of January, 2017.
DATED this 3rd day of January, 2017.
12 POTTER LAW OFFICES
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD &
By /s/ Cal J. Potter, III, Esq.
14 CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
15 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
16 1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, NV 89102
17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
By /s/ Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq
ROBERT W. FREEMAN, JR., ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3062
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89118
Attorney for Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 4, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?