Mitchell et al v. City of Henderson, Nevada et al

Filing 118

ORDER Granting 117 Stipulation to Extend (Second Request) Response Deadline re 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/10/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:13-cv-01154-APG-CWH Document 117 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 2

1 CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
2 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13255
3 POTTER LAW OFFICES
1125 Shadow Lane
4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Ph: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10 ANTHONY MITCHELL, LINDA
MITCHELL, and MICHAEL MITCHELL,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS,
14 NEVADA; JOSEPH CHRONISTER,
individually and in his official capacity as
15 Chief of the North Las Vegas Police
Department; MICHAEL WALLER, DREW
16 ALBERS, DAVID CAWTHORN, ERIC
ROCKWELL, F/N/U SNYDER,
17 individually and in their official capacities
as North Las Vegas Police Officers;
18 JANETTE R. REYER-SPEER; DOE
individuals 1-40, jointly and severally; and
19 ROE CORPORATIONS 1-40, jointly and
severally,
20
Defendants.
21 ____________________________________
22

Case No.: 2:13-cv-01154-APG-CWH

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Second Request)

COMES NOW, the above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel

23 of record, and hereby agree, jointly stipulate that the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’
24 Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 111] filed on September 22, 2016, currently due January
25 3, 2017, be extended an additional seven (7) days up to and including Tuesday, January 10,
26 2017.
27

Although Plaintiffs’ counsel has been actively working on responding to Defendants’

28 Motion, Plaintiffs’ counsel has been unable to complete the Response. Since the filing of the

Case 2:13-cv-01154-APG-CWH Document 117 Filed 01/03/17 Page 2 of 2

1 first Stipulation and Order to Extend Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
2 Judgment,[ECF 114], Plaintiffs’ counsel has had eleven (11) depositions, Plaintiffs’ counsel
3 has been preparing for a Jury Trial set to commence on January 3, 2017 in Donna Swigers, et
4 al. v. Mandalay Corp, et al., case number A-14-701182-C, which was vacated and re-set for
5 March 13, 2017, five (5) 9th Circuit Briefs due before January 1, 2017, and numerous
6 substantive motions and responses; as well as other general appearances and deadlines.
7

This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

8

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Response be extended an

9 additional seven (7) days up to and including Tuesday, January 10, 2017.
10

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.

11 DATED this 3rd day of January, 2017.

DATED this 3rd day of January, 2017.

12 POTTER LAW OFFICES

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD &
SMITH LLP

13
By /s/ Cal J. Potter, III, Esq.
14 CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
15 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
16 1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, NV 89102
17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By /s/ Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq
ROBERT W. FREEMAN, JR., ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3062
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89118
Attorney for Defendants

18
19
20
ORDER

21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24

January 4, 2017
_______________
DATED

______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2