Khan v. Colvin
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 9 Motion to Extend Time to Effect Service. Plaintiff shall file proof of service on or before 11/12/13. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/5/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
Paul S. Padda, Esq. (NV Bar 10417)
Email: ppadda@caplawyers.com
COHEN & PADDA, LLP
4240 West Flamingo Road, Suite 220
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Tele: (702) 366-1888
Fax: (702) 366-1940
Web: caplawyers.com
5
Attorney for the Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
KHALID HASAN KHAN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
) Case No. 2:13-cv-1173-GMN-PAL
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting )
Commissioner, United States
)
Social Security Administration, )
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________ )
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS
15
16
(First Request)
17
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff, Khalid Hasan Khan,
18
19
respectfully requests that the Court extend the date for effecting service and filing proof
20
thereof by 12 additional days or until November 12, 2013. Presently, service and proof
21
of service are due on October 31, 2013.
In support of this motion, Plaintiff relies upon the memorandum of points and
22
23
authorities set forth below.
24
. . .
25
. . .
26
. . .
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
2
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that a defendant, within 120-days
3
of the filing of a complaint initiating a civil action, be served with a copy of the complaint
4
and summons. However, the rule further provides that a Court may extend this
5
deadline for an appropriate period based upon a showing of “good cause.”
6
In this case, Mr. Khan’s Complaint was filed on July 3, 2013. The 120-day
7
period for service of the Complaint, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
8
4(m), expires on October 31, 2013. Mr. Khan would have effected service earlier
9
except Defendant made an appearance in this case on September 11, 2013.
10
Subsequently, the parties engaged in discussions exploring the possibility of resolving
11
this case. To that end, undersigned counsel agreed to another extension of time for
12
Defendant to file an Answer. Defendant filed a second extension request on October
13
25, 2013. The additional time will permit Defendant to compile agency records that will
14
hopefully lead to resolution of this case.
15
In light of the foregoing, specifically the discussion concerning resolution of this
16
case, good cause exists to extend Plaintiff’s time for effecting service of the Complaint
17
to and until November 12, 2013. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant this
18
request.
19
. . .
20
. . .
21
. . .
22
. . .
23
. . .
24
. . .
25
. . .
26
2
1
2
3
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court
grant this motion.
4
Respectfully submitted,
5
/s/ Paul S. Padda
____________________
Paul S. Padda, Esq.
COHEN & PADDA, LLP
4240 West Flamingo Rd., #220
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Tele: (702) 366-1888
Fax: (702) 366-1940
Web: caplawyers.com
6
7
8
9
10
Attorney for the Plaintiff
11
Dated: October 31, 2013
12
IT IS SO ORDERED:
13
Plaintiff’s time to effect service of the complaint,
as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
4(m), is hereby extended by 12-days or until
November 12, 2013. On or before that date,
Plaintiff shall file proof of service.
14
15
16
17
18
__________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5th
Dated: November ______, 2013
19
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
20
21
22
In compliance with the Court’s Local Rules, the undersigned hereby certifies that
on October 31, 2013, a copy of the foregoing document, “PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS” was
served (via the Court’s CM/ECF system) upon counsel of record for Defendant.
23
/s/ Paul S. Padda
____________________
Paul S. Padda, Esq.
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?