Takiguchi et al v. MRI International, Inc. et al
Filing
285
ORDER. The Suzuki Defendants have filed a motion to stay this action 283 . The hearing set for July 21, 2015, at 10:30 AM on Suzuki Defendants' renewed motion to permit the sale of real property 253 is vacated. The court defers consideratio n of the motion to permit sale until after there is a disposition of the Suzuki's motion to stay the action or until further order of the court. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 7/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SHIGE TAKIGUCHI, FUMI NONAKA,
)
MITSUAKI TAKITA, KAORUKO KOIZUMI, )
TATSURO SAKAI, SHIZUKO ISHIMORI, )
YOKO HATANO, YUKO NAKAMURA,
)
HIDEHITO MIURA, YOSHIKO TAZAKI, )
MASAAKI MORIYA, HATSUNE HATANO, )
SATORU MORIYA, HIDENAO TAKAMA,
)
SHIGERU KURISU, SAKA ONO,
)
KAZUHIRO MATSUMOTO, KAYA
)
HATANAKA, HIROKA YAMAJIRI,
)
KIYOHARU YAMAMOTO, JUNKO
)
YAMAMOTO, KOICHI INOUE, AKIKO
)
NARUSE, TOSHIMASA NOMURA, and
)
RITSU YURIKUSA, Individually and )
on Behalf of All Others Similarly )
Situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., EDWIN J. )
FUJINAGA, JUNZO SUZUKI, PAUL
)
MUSASHI SUZUKI, LVT, INC., dba
)
STERLING ESCROW, and DOES 1-500, )
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
2:13-cv-01183-JAD-VCF
ORDER
The Suzuki Defendants have filed a motion to stay this action
26
(#283). The hearing set for July 21, 2015, at 10:30 AM on Suzuki
27
Defendants’ renewed motion to permit the sale of real property
28
(#253) is vacated. The court defers consideration of the motion to
1
1
permit sale until after there is a disposition of the Suzuki’s
2
motion to stay the action or until further order of the court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: This 17th day of July, 2015.
5
6
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?