Takiguchi et al v. MRI International, Inc. et al

Filing 430

ORDER granting ECF No. 428 Stipulation Re: Notice of Class Certification. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 5/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 James E. Gibbons (State Bar No. 130631) MANNING & KASS 2 ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 4 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 5 Robert W. Cohen (pro hac vice) Cal. State Bar No. 150310 6 Mariko Taenaka (pro hac vice) Cal. State Bar No. 273895 7 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT W. COHEN, APC 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1770 8 Los Angeles, CA 90067 9 James Olson-State Bar No. 116 OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY & DESRUISSEAUX 10 9950 W. Cheyenne Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89129 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 SHIGE TAKIGUCHI, FUMI NONAKA, MITSUAKI TAKITA, KAORUKO KOIZUMI, 16 TATSURO SAKAI, SHIZUKO ISHIMORI, YOKO HATANO, YUKO NAKAMURA, 17 HIDEHITO MIURA, YOSHIKO TAZAKI, MASAAKI MORIYA, HATSUNE HATANO, 18 SATORU MORIYA, HIDENAO TAKAMA, SHIGERU KURISU, SAKA ONO, KAZUHIRO 19 MATSUMOTO, KAYA HATANAKA, IROKA YAMAJIRI, KIYOHARU YAMAMOTO, 20 JUNKO YAMAMOTO, KOICHI INOUE, AKIKO NARUSE, TOSHIMASA NOMURA, 21 and RITSU YURIKUSA, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarity Situated, 22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. 24 MRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., EDWIN J. 25 FUJINAGA, JUNZO SUZUKI, PAUL MUSASHI SUZUKI, LVT, INC., dba 26 STERLING ESCROW, and DOES 1-500, 27 Case No. 2:13-cv-01183-JAD-VCF HDM-VCF ORDER GRANTING STIPULATATION AND ORDER RE: NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION Defendants. 28 Case No. 2:13-cv-01183-JAD-VCF 1 PROPOSED NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION 1 Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting Class Certification (Dkt. 404) and the hearing held 2 on May 6, 2016, the parties submit the attached revised Notice of Class Certification. A copy of 3 the revised notice is attached as Exhibit A 4 Because virtually all of the class members are Japanese citizens, and due to the time 5 difference between California (class counsel’s location) and Japan, as well as the language barrier 6 between class members and Class Counsel, the proposed Notice includes contact information for 7 Class Counsel’s Japanese liaison attorneys (MRI Victims Attorney Group aka MRI Higai 8 Bengodan), to respond to questions from class members. 9 Once the Court approves the proposed notice, Class Counsel will translate the notice into 10 Japanese for dissemination in Japan. The notice will be disseminated within forty-five (45) days 11 from the Court’s approval by regular mail and by publication in the Saneki Shimbun, a Japanese 12 business-oriented newspaper with national circulation. Due to the high expense of publishing the 13 full notice, the parties suggest that only the attached summary notice be submitted for publication. 14 A copy of the summary notice is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 15 Dated: May 9, 2016 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 16 By: 17 18 /s/ James Gibbons JAMES E. GIBBONS STEVEN J. RENICK 19 ZACCARO MORGAN LLP 20 21 By: 22 23 24 /s/ Nicolas Morgan NICOLAS MORGAN Attorneys for Defendants Junzo Suzuki and Paul Suzuki HITZKE & ASSOCIATES 25 By: 26 27 28 2 /s/ Erick Ferran ERICK FERRAN Attorneys for Defendants MRI International, Inc. and Edwin Y. Fujinaga . Case No. 2:13-cv-01183-JAD-VCF PROPOSED NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION 1 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. GOLDSTEIN 2 3 By: 4 /s/ Robert Goldstein ROBERT A. GOLDSTEIN Attorneys for Defendant LVT, Inc., dba Sterling Escrow 5 The stipulation of the parties 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, (#428) is GRANTED. The proposed class notice filed IT IS SO ORDERED. on May 9, 2016, is hereby APPROVED. 7 8 May 9, 2016 DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________ Hon. Howard D. McKibben United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 2:13-cv-01183-JAD-VCF PROPOSED NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?