Takiguchi et al v. MRI International, Inc. et al

Filing 605

ORDER that the Court's Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Seal the MSJ ECF No. 531 is VACATED; Plaintiffs' Motion to Seal ECF No. 528 is DENIED; Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 529 shall be UNSEALED. < p>IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Suzukis' Motion to Seal ECF No. 562 is DENIED; Suzukis' responses to Plaintiffs' Statement of Facts ECF Nos. 564 and 567 shall be UNSEALED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Seal ECF No. 578 is DENIED; Plaintiffs' Reply to Suzuki's Response... ECF No. 579 shall be UNSEALED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 01/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

SHIGE TAKIGUCHI, FUMI NONAKA,
MITSUAKI TAKITA, TATSURO SAKAI,
SHIZUKO ISHIMORI, YUKO NAKAMURA,
MASAAKI MORIYA, HATSUNE HATANO,
AND HIDENAO TAKAMA, Individually
and on Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., EDWIN J )
FUJINAGA, JUNZO SUZUKI, PAUL
)
MUSASHI SUZUKI, LVT, INC., dba
)
STERLING ESCROW, and DOES 1-500, )
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )

2:13-cv-01183-HDM-VCF
ORDER

On January 10, 2017, the court entered an order to show cause

25

why several documents filed in connection with the plaintiffs’

26

motions for summary judgment should not be unsealed and the motions

27

to seal those documents denied (ECF No. 592).

28

any response to the court’s order, and the time for doing so has
1

No party has filed

1
2

expired.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the court’s order granting the

3

plaintiffs’ motion to seal the motion for summary judgment against

4

Junzo Suzuki (ECF No. 531) is hereby VACATED, and the plaintiffs’

5

motion to seal (ECF No. 528) is DENIED.

6

judgment against Junzo Suzuki (ECF No. 529) shall therefore be

7

UNSEALED.

8
9

The motion for summary

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Suzukis’ motion to seal their
responses to the plaintiff’s statement of facts (ECF No. 562) is

10

DENIED. The Suzukis’ responses to the plaintiffs’ statement of

11

facts (ECF Nos. 564 & 567) shall therefore be UNSEALED.

12

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion to seal

13

their reply to Junzo Suzuki’s responses to the plaintiffs’

14

statement of facts (ECF No. 578) is DENIED.

15

to Junzo Suzuki’s response to the plaintiffs’ statement of facts

16

(ECF No. 579) shall therefore be UNSEALED.

17

The plaintiffs’ reply

DATED: This 24th day of January, 2017.

18
19

____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2