Takiguchi et al v. MRI International, Inc. et al
Filing
793
ORDER granting ECF No. 792 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time to file a motion for preliminary approval. Motion due by 2/9/2018. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
JAMES E. GIBBONS (pro hac vice)
Cal. State Bar No. 130631
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
801 South Figueroa Street, 15th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel. (213) 624-6900
jeg@manningllp.com
5
10
ROBERT W. COHEN (pro hac vice)
Cal. State Bar No. 150310
MARIKO TAENAKA (pro hac vice)
Cal. State Bar No. 273895
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT W. COHEN, A.P.C.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel. (310) 282-7586
rwc@robertwcohenlaw.com
mt@robertwcohenlaw.com
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
16
17
SHIGE TAKIGUCHI, FUMI NONAKA,
MITSUAKI TAKITA, TATSURO SAKAI,
SHIZUKO ISHIMORI, YUKO NAKAMURA,
MASAAKI MORIYA, HATSUNE HATANO, and
HIDENAO TAKAMA, individually and on behalf of
all others similarity situated,
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: 2:13-cv-01183-HDM-NJK
ORDER AND STIPULATION FOR
SECOND CONTINUANCE OF
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AS TO MRI
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND
EDWIN FUJINAGA
MRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., EDWIN J.
FUJINAGA, JUNZO SUZUKI, PAUL MUSASHI
SUZUKI, LVT, INC., dba STERLING ESCROW,
and DOES 1-500,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
Plaintiffs Shige Takiguchi, et. al. and Defendants MRI International, Inc. (“MRI”) and Edwin
1
2
Fujinaga (collectively the “Parties”) submit this stipulation for an order continuing the deadline for
3
dispositive motions.
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2017 the Court ordered Parties to file a motion for preliminary
4
5
approval of class action settlement no later than December 11, 2017 (Dkt. 764);
WHEREAS, the Parties reached a settlement in principle in September 2017 and have exchanged
6
7
drafts of the settlement agreement (“Class Action Settlement Agreement”);
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2017 Mr. Fujinaga raised, for the first time, his concern that, since
8
9
a receiver has been appointed by the Court in the parallel U.S Securities and Exchange Commission’s
10
action against MRI and himself (SEC v. MRI International, Inc., USDC Nevada Case No. 2:13-cv-1658,
11
Dkt. 226) (“SEC Action”), he believed that he may not be authorized to enter into any settlement on
12
behalf of MRI or himself;
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2017, the Court appointed receiver in the SEC Action, Robb
13
14
Evans & Associates, confirmed its belief to plaintiff’s counsel that Mr. Fujinaga was not authorized to
15
enter into a settlement agreement with Plaintiffs and directed that Plaintiffs send a copy of the Class
16
Action Settlement Agreement to the receiver’s counsel, Lynch Law Practice;
WHEREAS, on November 30, 2017, the Receiver declined to enter into the Class Action
17
18
Settlement Agreement because he did not believe that the settlement would benefit the receivership
19
estate;
20
WHEREAS, on November 30, 2017, and December 7, 2017, Plaintiffs’ counsel met and
21
conferred with Receiver’s counsel, Michael Lynch, Esq., explaining that the order appointing receiver
22
specifically includes a carve-out provision exempting the present action from the Receiver’s control and
23
that, in any event, the settlement is in the best interest of all parties, including the receivership estate;
24
25
WHEREAS, the Receiver maintains its position that he is unable to authorize the settlement
absent direction from the Court;
26
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2017, the Parties filed a joint motion in the SEC Action requesting
27
direction from the Court, either that the Receiver lacks authority to direct the settlement in this action, or
28
that Judge Mahan order the Receiver to enter into the Class Action Settlement Agreement;
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
1
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2017, the Receiver filed a response to the joint motion;
2
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2018, the Parties filed a reply conveying this Court’s strong belief that
3
it is in the best interest of all the parties for Judge Mahan to approve the settlement;
4
WHEREAS, Judge Mahan has not yet ruled on the joint motion; and
5
WHEREAS, this is the Parties’ second request for a continuance;
6
NOW, therefore, the Parties jointly move that the Court enter an order providing for:
7
8
1. A 30-day continuance of the deadline to file a motion for preliminary approval to
February 9, 2018.
9
Dated: January 10, 2018
10
11
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
By:
12
13
/s/ James Gibbons
JAMES E. GIBBONS
STEVEN J. RENICK
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT W. COHEN
A Professional Corporation
15
16
17
By:
18
19
20
/s/ Robert W. Cohen
ROBERT W. COHEN
MARIKO TAENAKA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HITZKE & FERRAN
21
By:
22
23
/s/
Erick Ferran
Erick Ferran
Attorneys for Defendant MRI International,
Inc. and Edwin Fujinaga
24
25
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
January 10, 2018
DATED: _____________________
______________________________
United States District Judge
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?