Bradley v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 18 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 11 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 10/6/2014; Federal Bureau of Prisons answer due 10/6/2014; J. E. Thomas answer due 10/6/2014. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/16/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Attorney General
JEFFREY M. CONNER
Deputy Attorney General
Appellate Division
100 North Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717
Telephone: (775) 684-1200
5
Attorney for Respondents
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CARL BRADLEY,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF )
)
NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01196-RFB-GWF
MOTION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
(FIRST REQUEST)
17
Respondents, by and through counsel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General of the State of
18
Nevada, hereby respectfully move this Court for an order granting a fourteen (14) day enlargement of
19
time, to and including October 6, 2014, in which to file and serve their responsive pleading addressing
20
the issue of timeliness only.
21
This motion is based upon the provisions of Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
22
and the attached Declaration of Counsel, as well as all other papers, documents, records, pleadings and
23
other materials on file herein.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-1-
1
2
3
There have been no prior enlargements of Respondents’ time to file said response, and this
motion is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 22nd day of September, 2014.
4
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Attorney General
5
By:
6
/s/ Jeffrey M. Conner
JEFFREY M. CONNER
Deputy Attorney General
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
DATED this 16th day of October, 2014.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
3
4
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Attorney General
JEFFREY M. CONNER
Deputy Attorney General
Appellate Division
100 North Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717
Telephone: (775) 684-1200
5
Attorney for Respondents
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CARL BRADLEY,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF )
)
NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
1.
Case No. 2:13-cv-01196-RFB-GWF
DECLARATION OF COUNSEL
JEFFREY M. CONNER
I am a Deputy Attorney General employed by the Attorney General’s Office of the State of
18
Nevada in the Appellate Division, and I make this declaration on behalf of Respondents’ motion for
19
enlargement of time in the above-captioned matter.
20
2.
By this motion, I am requesting a fourteen (14) day enlargement of time, to and including
21
October 6, 2014, to comply with this Court’s order of July 24, 2014, requiring a responsive pleading
22
addressing the issue of timeliness only. (ECF No. 10.) This is my first request for an enlargement.
23
3.
Since this Court ordered Respondents to file a responsive pleading addressing the issue
24
of timeliness, I have been busy working on this case and other federal and state habeas corpus
25
matters, including: White v. Neven, Case No. 12-15033 (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals); Mack
26
v. Baker, Case No. 3:12-cv-00104; Estes v. LaGrand, Case No. 3:13-cv-00072; Ford v. Williams,
27
Case No. 2:13-cv-00087; Casillas-Gutierrez v. LeGrand, Case No. 3:13-cv-00448; Chambers v. Neven,
28
Case No. 2:13-cv-00489; Duke v. Neven, Case No. 2:13-cv-00688; Alcaraz v. Williams,
-3-
1
Case No. 2:13 cv-00818; Tagle v. Neven, Case No. 2:13-cv-01832; White v. McDaniel,
2
Case No. 01-01269C (First Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada); and Edwards v. Warden,
3
Case No. PI 08-0659 (Sixth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada). As a result of my busy
4
schedule, Respondents require additional time to complete a response that complies with this Court’s
5
July 24, 2014 order. Accordingly, Respondents respectfully request that this Court issue an order
6
granting Respondents an extension of fourteen (14) days, to and including October 6, 2014, to file their
7
response.
8
4.
9
10
11
12
This motion for enlargement of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of
unduly delaying the ultimate disposition of this case
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
By:
/s/ Jeffrey M. Conner
JEFFREY M. CONNER
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General and that on this 22nd day
3
of September, 2014, I served a copy of the foregoing MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
4
(FIRST REQUEST), by placing said document in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to:
5
6
7
8
Carl Bradley #43838-048
USP
P. O. Box 1000
Lewisburg, PA 17837
/s/ Laurie Sparman
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?