Bradley v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 18 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 11 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 10/6/2014; Federal Bureau of Prisons answer due 10/6/2014; J. E. Thomas answer due 10/6/2014. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/16/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO Attorney General JEFFREY M. CONNER Deputy Attorney General Appellate Division 100 North Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Telephone: (775) 684-1200 5 Attorney for Respondents 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CARL BRADLEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ) ) NEVADA, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) Case No. 2:13-cv-01196-RFB-GWF MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) 17 Respondents, by and through counsel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General of the State of 18 Nevada, hereby respectfully move this Court for an order granting a fourteen (14) day enlargement of 19 time, to and including October 6, 2014, in which to file and serve their responsive pleading addressing 20 the issue of timeliness only. 21 This motion is based upon the provisions of Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 22 and the attached Declaration of Counsel, as well as all other papers, documents, records, pleadings and 23 other materials on file herein. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -1- 1 2 3 There have been no prior enlargements of Respondents’ time to file said response, and this motion is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 22nd day of September, 2014. 4 CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO Attorney General 5 By: 6 /s/ Jeffrey M. Conner JEFFREY M. CONNER Deputy Attorney General 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge DATED this 16th day of October, 2014. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 2 3 4 CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO Attorney General JEFFREY M. CONNER Deputy Attorney General Appellate Division 100 North Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Telephone: (775) 684-1200 5 Attorney for Respondents 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CARL BRADLEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ) ) NEVADA, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) 1. Case No. 2:13-cv-01196-RFB-GWF DECLARATION OF COUNSEL JEFFREY M. CONNER I am a Deputy Attorney General employed by the Attorney General’s Office of the State of 18 Nevada in the Appellate Division, and I make this declaration on behalf of Respondents’ motion for 19 enlargement of time in the above-captioned matter. 20 2. By this motion, I am requesting a fourteen (14) day enlargement of time, to and including 21 October 6, 2014, to comply with this Court’s order of July 24, 2014, requiring a responsive pleading 22 addressing the issue of timeliness only. (ECF No. 10.) This is my first request for an enlargement. 23 3. Since this Court ordered Respondents to file a responsive pleading addressing the issue 24 of timeliness, I have been busy working on this case and other federal and state habeas corpus 25 matters, including: White v. Neven, Case No. 12-15033 (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals); Mack 26 v. Baker, Case No. 3:12-cv-00104; Estes v. LaGrand, Case No. 3:13-cv-00072; Ford v. Williams, 27 Case No. 2:13-cv-00087; Casillas-Gutierrez v. LeGrand, Case No. 3:13-cv-00448; Chambers v. Neven, 28 Case No. 2:13-cv-00489; Duke v. Neven, Case No. 2:13-cv-00688; Alcaraz v. Williams, -3- 1 Case No. 2:13 cv-00818; Tagle v. Neven, Case No. 2:13-cv-01832; White v. McDaniel, 2 Case No. 01-01269C (First Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada); and Edwards v. Warden, 3 Case No. PI 08-0659 (Sixth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada). As a result of my busy 4 schedule, Respondents require additional time to complete a response that complies with this Court’s 5 July 24, 2014 order. Accordingly, Respondents respectfully request that this Court issue an order 6 granting Respondents an extension of fourteen (14) days, to and including October 6, 2014, to file their 7 response. 8 4. 9 10 11 12 This motion for enlargement of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of unduly delaying the ultimate disposition of this case I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Conner JEFFREY M. CONNER 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General and that on this 22nd day 3 of September, 2014, I served a copy of the foregoing MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME 4 (FIRST REQUEST), by placing said document in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to: 5 6 7 8 Carl Bradley #43838-048 USP P. O. Box 1000 Lewisburg, PA 17837 /s/ Laurie Sparman 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?