Saintal v. Foster et al

Filing 7

ORDER that the Clerk shall electronically serve 4 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Priscella R. Saintal upon the respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, 4 amended petition. Petitioner shall have 45 days from the date of service of answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 PRISCELLA R. SAINTAL, 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) SHERYL FOSTER, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________/ Case No. 2:13-cv-01295-APG-VCF ORDER 16 This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, 17 by a Nevada state prisoner. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted. 18 (ECF No. 2). Petitioner has filed an amended petition. (ECF No. 4). The amended petition shall 19 now be filed and served on respondents. 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the 21 amended petition (ECF No. 4) upon the respondents. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from entry 23 of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended petition. In their answer 24 or other response, respondents shall address all claims presented in the amended petition. 25 Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including 26 1 lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. 2 If an answer is filed, respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules 3 Governing Proceedings in the United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. If an answer is 4 filed, petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by respondents shall 6 be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The hard copy 7 of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in the Reno 8 Division of the Clerk of Court. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon the Attorney 10 General of the State of Nevada a copy of every pleading, motion, or other document he submits for 11 consideration by the Court. Petitioner shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a 12 certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the Attorney 13 General. The Court may disregard any paper that does not include a certificate of service. After 14 respondents appear in this action, petitioner shall make such service upon the particular Deputy 15 Attorney General assigned to the case. 16 Dated: April 28, 2014. Dated: 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?