Dominguez-Hernandez et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 136

ORDER Granting 135 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 133 Motion for Re-Taxation of Costs (First Request). Replies due by 4/24/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Case 2:13-cv-01300-APG-NJK Document 135 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931
ALINA M. SHELL, Nevada Bar No. 11711
MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC
701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

JDH, a minor by and through her legal
guardian and/or parent, Inocente Dominguez,
and MARIA HERNANDEZ, an individual.

CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-01300-APG-NJK

11
Plaintiffs,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO
LVMPD DEFENDANTS’
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO RETAX (FIRST
REQUEST) [ECF No. 133]

vs.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT; LAS VEGAS
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICER J. BARKER (in his individual
capacity); and LAS VEGAS
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICER M. PURCARO (in his individual
capacity),
Defendants.

21
22
23

Plaintiffs JDH and Maria Hernandez, by and through their attorneys of record,

24

Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell of McLetchie Shell, LLC, and Defendants Las

25

Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (“LVMPD”), LVMPD Officer J. Barker, and

26

LVMPD Officer M. Purcaro, by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson,

27

Esq., Nick D. Crosby, Esq., and Christian T. Balducci, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach Coffing,

28

hereby agree to stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiffs to file their Reply to Defendants’

1

Case 2:13-cv-01300-APG-NJK Document 135 Filed 04/17/17 Page 2 of 2

1

Response to Motion to Retax Bill of Costs (ECF No. 133) which is currently due April 17,

2

2017, to April 24, 2017.

3

This stipulation is made because Plaintiffs’ counsel has an opening brief due with the

4

Nevada Supreme Court on April 17, 2017 in Martin v. State, Case No. 71806. Counsel for

5

Plaintiffs also has an oral argument scheduled for April 20, 2017 at the Ninth Circuit in

6

United States v. Steven Grimm, CA No. 16-10007, and will thus be out of the office April 19

7

through April 20, 2017. As such, the stipulation for an extension of time is not for any

8

improper purpose or for the purpose of delay.

9
10
11

DATED this 17th day of April, 2017.

DATED this 17th day of April, 2017.

MCLETCHIE SHELL, LLC

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12
13
14
15
16

By: /s/ Alina M. Shell
Alina M. Shell
Nevada Bar No. 11711
701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorney for Plaintiffs

17

By: /s/ Christian T. Balducci, Esq.
Christian T. Balducci, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12688
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorney for Defendants
ORDER

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Response to Motion to

20

Retax Bill of Costs (ECF No. 133) in the above-referenced matter is extended to April 24,

21

2017.

22

DATED this 19th day of ______________, 2017.
____
April

23
24
25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28

2