Dominguez-Hernandez et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 66

ORDER that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b), the Ninth Circuits decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10

J.D.H., et al.,

11

Plaintiff(s),

12

vs.

13

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,

14
Defendant(s).
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:13-cv-01300-APG-NJK
ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (Docket No. 64), which the Court

17

approved to facilitate discovery in this case. This order reminds counsel that there is a presumption

18

of public access to judicial files and records. A party seeking to file a confidential document under

19

seal must file a motion to seal and must comply with the Ninth Circuit’s directives in Kamakana v.

20

City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).

21

The Court has adopted electronic filing procedures, and with a few exceptions not applicable

22

here, the Clerk of the Court no longer maintains paper records. Special Order 109 requires the Clerk

23

of the Court to maintain the official files for all cases filed on or after November 7, 2005, in

24

electronic form. The electronic record constitutes the official record of the court. Attorneys must file

25

documents under seal using the Court’s electronic filing procedures. See Local Rule 10-5(b). That

26

rule provides:

27
28

Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior Court order, papers filed
with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a motion for leave to file
those documents under seal, and shall be filed in accordance with the Court’s

1

electronic filing procedures. If papers are filed under seal pursuant to prior
Court order, the papers shall bear the following notation on the first page,
directly under the case number: “FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO
COURT ORDER DATED __________.” All papers filed under seal will
remain sealed until such time as the Court may deny the motion to seal or
enter an order to unseal them, or the documents are unsealed pursuant to
Local Rule.

2
3
4
5

Id. Documents filed under seal are not accessible to the public.

6

The Court has approved the blanket protective order to facilitate discovery exchanges. But

7

there has been no showing, and the Court has not found, that any specific documents are secret or

8

confidential. The parties have not provided specific facts supported by declarations or concrete

9

examples to establish that a protective order is required to protect any specific trade secret or other

10

confidential information pursuant to Rule 26(c) or that disclosure would cause an identifiable and

11

significant harm. The Ninth Circuit has held that there is a presumption of public access to judicial

12

files and records, and that parties seeking to maintain the confidentiality of documents attached to

13

nondispositive motions must show good cause exists to overcome the presumption of public access.

14

See Kamakana 447 F.3d at 1179. Parties seeking to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to

15

dispositive motions must show compelling reasons sufficient to overcome the presumption of public

16

access. Id. at 1180.1

17

If the sole ground for a motion to seal is that the opposing party (or non-party) has designated

18

a document as subject to protection pursuant to the stipulated protective order, the movant must

19

notify the opposing party (or non-party) at least seven days prior to filing the designated document.

20

The designating party must then make a good faith determination if the relevant standard for sealing

21

is met. To the extent the designating party does not believe the relevant standard for sealing can be

22

met, it shall indicate that the document may be filed publicly no later than four days after receiving

23

notice of the intended filing. To the extent the designating party believes the relevant standard for

24

sealing can be met, it shall provide a declaration supporting that assertion no later than four days

25
26
27
28

1

Additional information regarding the requirements for filing under seal can be found at The
Vaccine Center LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 68298 (D. Nev. May 14, 2013)
(discussing, inter alia, the standards for sealing, standard for redaction rather than sealing entire
documents, and impact of the stipulated protective order on a motion to seal).
2

1

after receiving notice of the intended filing. The filing party shall then attach that declaration to its

2

motion to seal the designated material. If the designating party fails to provide such a declaration in

3

support of the motion to seal, the filing party shall file a motion to seal so indicating and the Court

4

may order the document filed in the public record.2

5

IT IS ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b),

6

the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with

7

respect to any documents filed under seal. To the extent any aspect of the stipulated protective order

8

may conflict with this order or Local Rule 10-5(b), that aspect of the stipulated protective order is

9

hereby superseded with this order.

10

DATED: March 9, 2015

11
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

In the event of an emergency motion, the above procedures shall not apply. Instead, the
movant shall file a motion to seal and the designating party shall file a declaration in support of that
motion to seal within three days of its filing. If the designating party fails to timely file such a
declaration, the Court may order the document filed in the public record.
3