Farnum v. LeGrand
Filing
66
ORDER Granting 65 First Motion to Extend Time Re: 53 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents' answer due 6/7/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
JEFFREY M. CONNER (Bar. No. 11543)
Deputy Solicitor General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
100 North Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701-4717
(775) 684-1100 (phone)
(775) 684-1108 (fax)
jconner@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Respondents
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
JOHN MICHAEL FARNUM,
Case No. 2:13-cv-01304-APG-PAL
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
(FIRST REQUEST)
Petitioner,
11
12
vs.
13
ROBERT LeGRAND, et al.,
14
Respondents.
ORDER
15
Respondents, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada,
16
hereby respectfully move this Court for an order granting a fifty-nine (59) day enlargement of time, to
17
and including June 7, 2019, in which to file and serve their answer to the remaining claims of the
18
Mr. Farnum’s petition.
19
This motion is based upon the provisions of Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
20
and the attached Declaration of Counsel, as well as all other papers, documents, records, pleadings and
21
other materials on file herein.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
30
31
1
2
3
There have been no prior enlargements of Respondents’ time to file said answer, and this
motion is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 9th day of April. 2019.
4
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
5
By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Conner
JEFFREY M. CONNER (Bar. No. 11543)
Deputy Solicitor General
6
7
8
9
10
11
ORDER
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated this ____ day of ___________________________, 2019
15
16
17
DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES JUDGE
Dated: April 9, 2019.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
30
31
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?