Farnum v. LeGrand

Filing 66

ORDER Granting 65 First Motion to Extend Time Re: 53 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents' answer due 6/7/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 AARON D. FORD Attorney General JEFFREY M. CONNER (Bar. No. 11543) Deputy Solicitor General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 100 North Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4717 (775) 684-1100 (phone) (775) 684-1108 (fax) jconner@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Respondents 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 JOHN MICHAEL FARNUM, Case No. 2:13-cv-01304-APG-PAL UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) Petitioner, 11 12 vs. 13 ROBERT LeGRAND, et al., 14 Respondents. ORDER 15 Respondents, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, 16 hereby respectfully move this Court for an order granting a fifty-nine (59) day enlargement of time, to 17 and including June 7, 2019, in which to file and serve their answer to the remaining claims of the 18 Mr. Farnum’s petition. 19 This motion is based upon the provisions of Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 20 and the attached Declaration of Counsel, as well as all other papers, documents, records, pleadings and 21 other materials on file herein. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 30 31 1 2 3 There have been no prior enlargements of Respondents’ time to file said answer, and this motion is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 9th day of April. 2019. 4 AARON D. FORD Attorney General 5 By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Conner JEFFREY M. CONNER (Bar. No. 11543) Deputy Solicitor General 6 7 8 9 10 11 ORDER 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated this ____ day of ___________________________, 2019 15 16 17 DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES JUDGE Dated: April 9, 2019. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 30 31

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?