Edwards v. Clark County et al

Filing 183

ORDER that 182 Motion for Enforcement of Order is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 RONNIE EDWARDS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, et al ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ ) 12 13 Case No. 2:13-cv-01316-JAD-CWH ORDER Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 182) for enforcement of order, filed on August 26, 2016. Defendants have not filed a response. 14 On August 12, 2016, this court ordered (ECF No. 181) the Clerk of Court to send to Plaintiff 15 a copy of all pleadings, motions, papers, and exhibits filed by him in this case. Upon receipt of these 16 documents, Plaintiff represents that he did not receive a copy of ECF No. 141, or its attachments, 17 which together total 1,342 pages. The Clerk of Court has affirmed that hard-copies of all requested 18 documents were delivered to Plaintiff, and that ECF No. 141 and its attachments were included in 19 the delivery. 20 Although the evidence available suggests that copies of ECF No. 141 and its attachments 21 were provided to Plaintiff, the court will provide an additional copy of these documents out of an 22 abundance of caution, and to ensure that Plaintiff’s ability to pursue his appeal is not hindered. 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 182) for enforcement of 2 order is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court must forward to Plaintiff a complete copy of ECF No. 141 3 and its attachments. 4 DATED: September 6, 2016. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?