Edwards v. Clark County et al
Filing
70
ORDER that 68 Motion of Concern is Granted in part and Denied as moot in part. Plaintiff's request that defendants resend their responses is denied as moot. However, plaintiff's request for the Court to extend the reply deadlines is granted. Plaintiff shall have until April 6, 2015 to file his replies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/18/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
RONNIE EDWARDS,
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
)
DEPARTMENT, et al.
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01316-JAD-CWH
ORDER
13
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Ronnie Edwards’s (“plaintiff”) Motion of Concern
14
(doc. # 68), filed March 16, 2015, and Defendants Raymond Mondora and Katrina Simeon’s
15
(“defendants”) Notice of Remailing of Documents (doc. # 69), filed March 17, 2015.
16
In the instant motion, plaintiff asserts he never received copies of defendants’ responses (docs.
17
# 66, # 67) to plaintiff’s motions (docs. # 61, # 65) and asks that copies be sent to him so he can file
18
replies, and that the Court extend the deadlines for these replies. Defendants, in their notice, contend
19
they resent their responses to plaintiff upon receipt of the instant motion.
20
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion of Concern (doc. # 68) is
21
granted in part and denied as moot in part. Plaintiff’s request that defendants resend their
22
responses is denied as moot. However, plaintiff’s request for the Court to extend the reply deadlines
23
is granted. Plaintiff shall have until April 6, 2015 to file his replies.
24
DATED: March 18, 2015
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?