Edwards v. Clark County et al
Filing
89
ORDER that 88 Emergency Motion to Compel Copies is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
RONNIE EDWARDS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
)
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01316-JAD-CWH
ORDER
16
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dr. Raymond Mondora and Nurse Katrina
17
Simeon’s (“Defendants”) Emergency Motion to Compel Copies (doc. # 88), filed April 20, 2015. In
18
the instant motion, Defendants seek to compel Plaintiff Ronnie Edwards (“Plaintiff”) to resend legible
19
copies of his HIPAA authorization forms, claiming the forms previously received from Plaintiff
20
contained an unverifiable signature and date.
21
Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) governs requests for production.
22
Rule 34 permits a party to serve on another party a request to produce or allow inspection of
23
documents or tangible items that are in the “responding party’s possession, custody, or control.” Fed.
24
R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Rule 34 requests must fall within the scope of discovery as defined in Rule 26(b)
25
of the FRCP. See Clark v. Vega Wholesale, Inc., 181 F.R.D. 470, 471 (D. Nev. 1998).
26
As a preliminary matter, this Court notes that Plaintiff complied with Defendants’ initial
27
request to submit signed and dated HIPAA authorization forms so Defendants could continue to
28
request, receive, and disclose Plaintiff’s medical records from medical providers. However, this Court
1
finds that Plaintiff was under no obligation to comply with Defendants’ request. As this Court
2
previously held, “HIPAA regulations provide a satisfactory means for obtaining relevant medical
3
records for purpose[s] of litigation without the requirement for a signed authorization by the
4
party.” Lopez v. Cardenas Markets, Inc., No. 2:11-CV-00323-ECR, 2011 WL 4738111, at *3 (D.
5
Nev. Oct. 5, 2011) (citing Powell v. Texvans, Inc., No. 2:09-CV-01079-LDG, 2010 WL 4791507, at
6
*2 (D. Nev. Nov. 18, 2010)) (emphasis added). Given such, Defendants cannot compel Plaintiff to
7
execute a HIPAA authorization for release of medical records from medical providers. Defendants
8
are not without an alternative, however, and can secure copies of medical records from the relevant
9
custodian pursuant to a Rule 45 subpoena. See Lopez, 2011 WL 4738111, at *3.
10
11
12
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Emergency Motion to Compel
Copies (doc. # 88) is denied.
DATED: April 21, 2015
13
14
15
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?