Friedman v. Adams et al
Filing
26
ORDER that 25 Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery on Two Non-Parties is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
KENNETH FRIEDMAN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
LINDA ADAMS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01345-JCM-CWH
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Kenneth Friedman’s (“plaintiff”) Motion to Conduct Limited
Discovery on Two Non-Parties (doc. # 25), filed February 19, 2015.
16
Plaintiff asks the Court to allow him to conduct limited discovery to obtain information from
17
two non-party individuals, Warden Dwight Neven (“Neven”) and Case Worker Jamie Rainone
18
(“Rainone”), as they are purportedly “material witnesses” to his case. See Doc. # 25 at 1. Because
19
plaintiff is asking for discovery involving non-parties, plaintiff’s request is more properly brought
20
before this Court as a motion under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which governs
21
discovery of non-parties by subpoena.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Conduct Limited
23
Discovery on Two Non-Parties (doc. # 25) is denied. Plaintiff is directed to file a Rule 45 motion, and
24
to specify in that motion the type of information he seeks to obtain from Neven and Rainone, if he
25
wishes this Court to consider his request.
26
DATED: February 20, 2015
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?