Howard v. Foster et al

Filing 136

ORDER Granting 135 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Submit Proposed Findings of Fact (First Request). Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Margaret A. McLetchie, Nevada Bar No. 10931 Alina M. Shell, Nevada Bar No. 11711 MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC 701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 728-5300 Facsimile: (702) 425-8220 Email: maggie@nvlitigation.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 REGINALD HOWARD, 10 Plaintiff, 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 (702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F) WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM 12 13 14 v. Case No.: 2:13-cv-01368-RFB-NJK STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACTS (First Request) S. FOSTER, et al., Defendants. 15 COME NOW, Plaintiff, Reginald Howard, by and through his attorneys, Margaret A. 16 McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm of McLetchie Shell, LLC, along with 17 Defendants, Aaron Dicus, Sean Bloomfield, and Gustavo Sanchez, by and through their 18 attorneys, Adam Paul Laxalt and Frank A. Toddre II, of Nevada Attorney General’s Office, 19 and hereby agree and stipulate to an extension of three weeks to submit simultaneous 20 proposed findings of fact as identified at the hearing and to provide a WORD doc version to 21 the courtroom deputy. (see Minute Order, ECF No. 134). The current deadline is June 20, 22 2018. A three-week extension would make the new deadline for the proposed findings of fact 23 due on July 11, 2018. 24 This extension is necessary because counsel for Plaintiff has an opposition to an 25 Emergency Motion for a Writ of Prohibition due on June 18, 2018 in Las Vegas Metropolitan 26 Police Department v. Eighth Judicial District Court, Nevada Supreme Court Case No. 27 76023. Counsel for Plaintiff also has an Opposition to a Motion for Summary Judgment due 28 on June 22, 2018 in Walker, et al. v. City of North Las Vegas, et al., U.S. Dist. Ct. Case No. 1 1 2:14-cv-01475-JAD-NJK. Counsel for Plaintiff also has a settlement statement due on June 2 22, 2018 in Trost v. Cox, et al., U.S. Dist. Ct. Case No. 3:14-cv-0611-MMD-WGC. Further, 3 on June 29, 2018, counsel for Plaintiff will be in Boise, Idaho for a settlement conference in 4 the Trost matter. Counsel for Defendants in this matter is also counsel for Defendants in 5 Trost and thus has the same deadlines for filing a settlement statement and participating in 6 the settlement conference in that case. Finally, counsel for Plaintiff has an Answering Brief 7 due on July 6, 2018 in Clark County Office of the Coroner/Medical Examiner v. Las Vegas 8 Review-Journal, Nevada Supreme Court Case No. 74604. 9 This Stipulation is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay, 10 but in the interest of effectively representing Plaintiff’s interests in this matter. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 (702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F) WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DATED this 15th day of June, 2018. DATED this 15th day of June, 2018. /s/ Alina M. Shell MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE Nevada Bar No. 10931 ALINA M. SHELL Nevada Bar No. 11711 MCLETCHIE SHELL, LLC 701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 728-5300 maggie@nvlitigation.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Reginald Howard /s/ Frank A. Toddre, II ADAM PAUL LAXALT Nevada Bar No.12426 FRANK A. TODDRE II Nevada Bar No. 11474 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Bureau of Litigation – Public Safety Division 555 E. Washington Ave., Suite 3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 486-3149 ftoddre@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants 21 22 ORDER 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 DATED: June 21, 2018 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITES STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?