Rimer v. Sandoval et al

Filing 64

ORDER that Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copyof 47 fourth amended complaint on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, attention Kat Howe. Notice due from Attorney General within 21 days. Answer due 5/8/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Kat Howe TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 STANLEY RIMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BRIAN SANDOVAL et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) 2:13-cv-1440-JCM-GWF ORDER 13 14 This is an action on a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, removed from 15 state court. The Court entered a screening order on the fourth amended complaint on 16 November 10, 2014. (ECF No. 50). The screening order imposed a 90-day stay and the 17 Court entered a subsequent order in which the parties were assigned to mediation by a court- 18 appointed mediator. (ECF No. 50, 55). The Office of the Attorney General has filed a status 19 report indicating that settlement has not been reached and informing the Court of its intent to 20 proceed with this action. (ECF No. 63). 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 22 1. The Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copy 23 of Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint (ECF No. 47) on the Office of the Attorney General of 24 the State of Nevada, attention Kat Howe. 25 2. Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 50), within twenty-one 26 (21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a notice 27 advising the Court and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it accepts 28 service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the 1 names of the defendants for whom it is filing last-known-address information under seal. As 2 to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney General’s Office cannot accept service, 3 the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom 4 it has such information. 5 3. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiff shall 6 file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and 7 specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to which the 8 Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information, Plaintiff shall provide the 9 full name and address for the defendant(s). 10 4. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), 11 such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within 12 sixty (60) days from the date of this order. 13 5. Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been 14 entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document 15 submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper 16 submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document 17 was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice 18 of appearance, Plaintiff shall direct service to the individual attorney named in the notice of 19 appearance, at the address stated therein. The Court may disregard any paper received by 20 a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk of the Court, and 21 any paper received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk of the Court which fails 22 to include a certificate showing proper service. 23 24 DATED: This 9th day of March, 2015. 25 26 _________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?