United States of America v. Pivaroff et al

Filing 249

ORDER Granting 248 Stipulation. Jay R. Nanavati of Baker Hoftetler is substituted in the place of Jeffrey D. Lewin and Donald G. Rez of Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel for Defendant Blenheim Trust Company, Ltd., as Trustee of Kihei International Trust, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 9 10 Case No. 2:13-cv-01498-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER v. (Subst Atty – ECF No. 248) IVAN G. PIVAROFF, et al., Defendants. 11 12 This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 248) filed 13 October 5, 2016. Jay R. Nanavati of Baker Hostetler seeks leave to be substituted in the place 14 and stead of Jeffrey D. Lewin and Donald G. Rez of Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel for 15 Defendant Blenheim Trust Company, Ltd. LR IA 10-6 provides that the signature of an attorney 16 to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial 17 proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order.” LR IA 10-6(d) 18 also provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial 19 proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.” 20 IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 248) is APPROVED. 22 2. Jay R. Nanavati of Baker Hoftetler is substituted in the place of Jeffrey D. Lewin and 23 Donald G. Rez of Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel for Defendant Blenheim Trust 24 Company, Ltd., as Trustee of Kihei International Trust, subject to the provisions of 25 LR IA 10-6(c) and (d). 26 DATED this 11th day of October, 2016. 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?