United States of America v. Pivaroff et al
Filing
249
ORDER Granting #248 Stipulation. Jay R. Nanavati of Baker Hoftetler is substituted in the place of Jeffrey D. Lewin and Donald G. Rez of Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel for Defendant Blenheim Trust Company, Ltd., as Trustee of Kihei International Trust, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
8
9
10
Case No. 2:13-cv-01498-JCM-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
(Subst Atty – ECF No. 248)
IVAN G. PIVAROFF, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 248) filed
13
October 5, 2016. Jay R. Nanavati of Baker Hostetler seeks leave to be substituted in the place
14
and stead of Jeffrey D. Lewin and Donald G. Rez of Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel for
15
Defendant Blenheim Trust Company, Ltd. LR IA 10-6 provides that the signature of an attorney
16
to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial
17
proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order.” LR IA 10-6(d)
18
also provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial
19
proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.”
20
IT IS ORDERED that:
21
1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 248) is APPROVED.
22
2. Jay R. Nanavati of Baker Hoftetler is substituted in the place of Jeffrey D. Lewin and
23
Donald G. Rez of Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel for Defendant Blenheim Trust
24
Company, Ltd., as Trustee of Kihei International Trust, subject to the provisions of
25
LR IA 10-6(c) and (d).
26
DATED this 11th day of October, 2016.
27
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?