United States of America v. Pivaroff et al
Filing
256
ORDER Granting #255 Motion to Confirm Sale and Direct Distribution of Sale Proceeds re #235 Order by Plaintiff United States of America. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance - ADR)
Case 2:13-cv-01498-JCM-PAL Document 255-2 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
IVAN G. PIVAROFF, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
9
Case No. 2:13-cv-01498-JCM-PAL
ORDER CONFIRMING SALE AND DIRECTING
DISTRIBUTION OF SALE PROCEEDS
10
This matter has come before the Court upon the United States’ Motion to Confirm Sale
11
and Direct Distribution of Sale Proceeds. For good cause shown, it is hereby
12
ORDERED ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:
13
1.
The United States’ Motion to Confirm Sale and Direct Distribution of Sale
14
Proceeds is GRANTED;
15
2.
The sale at public auction of the condominium located at 3111 Bel Air Drive,
16
#28F, Las Vegas, Nevada, to Guy Meeker is CONFIRMED, the property being more particularly
17
described as follows:
18
19
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF CLARK, STATE OF
NEVADA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
20
PARCEL I:
21
Unit 216 of amended plat of Regency Towers as the same is
established and identified in the plan of condominium filed
pursuant to the provisions of NRS 117.020 on April 12, 1972 in
Book 14 of Plats, Page 37, and on August 10, 1973 in Book 16 of
Plats, Page 27, in the official records of Clark County, Nevada
(“Plan”) and amendments thereto.
22
23
-1-
Case 2:13-cv-01498-JCM-PAL Document 255-2 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 3
1
PARCEL II:
2
An undivided .860% interest in the common areas included in the
plan.
3
PARCEL III:
4
An undivided .860% interest in the estate for years created by that
certain lease dated January 1, 1971 between Chanin Nevada
Properties, Inc., as landlord and Regency Holding Corp. as tenant,
recorded on January 7, 1971 as instrument No. 72485, Book No.
91, in official records of Clark County, Nevada.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
3.
The Internal Revenue Service Property Appraisal and Liquidation Specialists unit
shall prepare and deliver a deed to the buyer of the property, Guy Meeker;
4.
The Clerk of Court shall remit $1,632.88 to the IRS for the costs of sale by
mailing a check in that amount payable to “United States Treasury” to:
Hallie Lipscomb
Internal Revenue Service
Property Appraisal and Liquidation Specialist
4330 Watt Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95821;
5.
The Clerk of Court shall remit a $7,901.31 to the Clark County Treasurer by
mailing a check payable to “Clark County Treasurer” to:
Clark County Treasurer
500 S Grand Central Parkway 1st Floor
PO Box 551220
Las Vegas, NV 89155;
6.
The Clerk of Court shall remit $75,000.00 to Associated Enterprises, Ltd., by
mailing a check in that amount payable to “Sylvester & Polednak, Ltd. Client Trust Account” to:
Allyson R. Noto
Sylvester & Polednak, Ltd.
1731 Village Center Circle
Las Vegas, NV 89134; and
23
-2-
Case 2:13-cv-01498-JCM-PAL Document 255-2 Filed 01/17/17 Page 3 of 3
1
7.
The Clerk of Court shall remit the remainder of the sale proceeds, $405,465.81,
2
along with any accrued interest, to the United States for application to the 1980, 1982, 1983 and
3
1986 federal income tax liabilities of Ivan and Gwendolyn Pivaroff, by mailing a check payable
4
to “U.S. Department of Justice” to:
5
6
Philip Doyle
United States Department of Justice, Tax Division
P.O. Box 14198
Washington, DC 20044
7
SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.
8
20th
January
Signed this _________ day of ____________________, 2017.
9
10
____________________________________
JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
Distribution to all electronically
registered counsel of record and
by mail to all pro se parties
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?