Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
52
ORDER Denying without prejudice 43 Motion to Give Judicial Notice. Denying without prejudice 44 Motion to Give Judicial Notice. Denying without prejudice 49 Motion for the Court to Issue Subpoena Duces Tecum. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/4/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01527-JAD-CWH
ORDER
12
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Give Judicial Notice (#43), filed on
13
June 20, 2014, Plaintiff’s Motion to Give Judicial Notice (#44), filed on June 20, 2014, and
14
Plaintiff’s Motion for the Court to Issue Subpoena Duces Tecum (#49), filed on July 8, 2014. The
15
Court also considered Defendants Response (#47), filed on July 7, 2014.
16
Preliminarily, Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice of facts related to service
17
of process of the defendants in this action. This is not an appropriate basis for judicial notice.
18
However, the Court will assume that Plaintiff requests that the Court issue a subpoena for
19
information related to the Defendants. Indeed, Plaintiff requests that the Court order Defendant
20
Elizabeth Neighbors to provide the names of the forensic staff supervisors so service can be
21
accomplished. In response, Defendant provided the only ascertainable name of the forensic staff
22
supervisor referenced in Plaintiff’s complaint - Phillip Hawkrigg. Plaintiff would need to provide
23
more information regarding identifiable details about the second supervisor in order to allow the
24
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services to determine his or her identity. Accordingly,
25
the Court will deny Plaintiff’s Motion (#43) without prejudice.
26
Additionally, Plaintiff requests that the Court issue subpoena duces tecum to Clark County
27
County Detention Center and the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services at its Lake’s
28
Crossing Center to provide the full names and last-known addresses of the two forensic staff
1
supervisors identified in his complaint, Binko, Hem, Wooden, and Rohan. The Court previously
2
granted this relief in Order #34. Additionally, the Court noted that Rohan was not directed to be
3
served in Order #8, and therefore, amended the subpoena issued (#37) to reflect this change.
4
Plaintiff provided no additional information warranting reissue of the subpoena and noted that the
5
custodian of records for Clark County Detention Center complied by providing the available
6
information. Therefore, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s Motion (#44) and Motion (#49) without
7
prejudice.
8
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Give Judicial Notice (#43) is
10
11
12
13
denied without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Give Judicial Notice (#44) is
denied without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for the Court to Issue Subpoena
14
Duces Tecum (#49) is denied without prejudice.
15
Dated this 4th day of August, 2014.
16
17
18
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?