Gee v. Hendroffe
Filing
13
ORDER Sealing Docket Nos. 1 Petition for Judicial Review, 2 Motion Warrant in Lieu of Habeas Corpus, 4 Proposed Order Submission, 5 Proposed Order Submission, 6 Proposed Order Submission, 7 Declaration, 9 Notice of Complaint, and 11 Certificate of Service. The Court hereby ORDERS that the public docket be revised. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 09/03/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
WILLIAM GEE,
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
14
It has come to the Court’s attention that the Docket Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 11 have been
9
10
Plaintiff,
vs.
11
HANNIE HENDROFFE,
12
Defendant.
Case No. 2:13-cv-01582-JCM-NJK
ORDER SEALING DOCKET NOS. 1,
2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 11.
AND ORDERING DOCKET TO BE
CORRECTED
15
filed without redacting the birth dates of Petitioner and Respondent’s children and/or the home
16
address of Respondent. In so doing, Petitioner violated Special Order No. 108, which requires the
17
partial redaction of dates of birth and home addresses (among other redactions). Accordingly, the
18
Court hereby ORDERS that Docket Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 11 be sealed. In addition,
19
Petitioner’s counsel shall refile on the public docket, no later than September 10, 2013, redacted
20
versions of Docket Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 11 that comply with Special Order No. 108.
21
Docket Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 11 also list the first names of Petitioner and Respondent’s
22
children, in violation of Special Order No. 108, which requires that only a minor’s initials be
23
provided. The Court hereby ORDERS that the public docket be revised so that it reflects only that
24
Petitioner and Respondent are the parents of “J.G.” and “S.G.”
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: September 3, 2013
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?