Securities and Exchange Commission v. Fujinaga et al
Filing
258
ORDER Granting Receiver's 244 Motion for an Order approving and authorizing payment of fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver's 245 Motion for an Order finding Notice to Creditor's to be Sufficient is Granted. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/10/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
9
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Case No. 2:13-CV-1658 JCM (CWH)
ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
v.
10
11
EDWIN YOSHIHIRO FUJINAGA and MRI
INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,
12
Defendant(s).
13
14
Presently before the court is receiver Robb Evans &
15
16
fees and expenses. (Doc. # 244). No response was filed, and the deadline to respond has now
17
passed.
18
Also before the court is
motion for order granting relief from Local Rule 66-
19
5 pertaining to notice of creditors.1 (Doc. # 245). No response was filed, and the deadline to
20
respond has now passed.
21
roving and authorizing payment of receivership
22
fees and expenses incurred for the period from February 23, 2015 through March 31, 2015
23
24
of $1,489.73,
25
26
27
1
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
The instant motions are actually a single document filed twice on the docket. The court
will
.
However, because the motions are related, the court will discuss them together.
1
as well
2
as the law supporting an award of the requested fees. (Doc. # 244). District of Nevada Local Rule
3
7-2(d) provides that
4
any motion shall constitute a consent to the granti
5
therefore grant the instant unopposed motion.
-2(d). The court will
6
7
Local Civil Rule 66-5 based on the service of the notice of the filing of this motion and the motion
8
on all parties and service of the notice of the filing of the motion on all known non-consumer
9
10
Local Rule 66-5 provides that unless the court otherwise orders, the receiver shall give all
11
of hearings
12
on applications for fees of the receiver. D. Nev. R. 66-5(d). The court has not scheduled a hearing
13
on the instant motion, and finds that it is unnecessary to do so.
14
However, to the extent that Local Rule 66-5 applies here, the court finds that the receiver
15
has given sufficient notice to creditors under the rule. The receiver filed the instant motion on the
16
public CM/ECF docket in this case. The court set response deadlines for the motions. These
17
deadlines have now passed and no response or other objection has been filed by any party.
18
Good cause appearing, the court will grant the motions.
19
Accordingly,
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDG
21
an order approving and authorizing payment of fees, (doc. # 244), be, and the same hereby is,
22
GRANTED.
23
for an order finding notice to
24
creditors to be sufficient under Local Rule 66-5, (doc. # 245), be, and the same hereby is,
25
GRANTED.
26
DATED August 10, 2015.
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?