SFR Investments Pool 1 LLC, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 66

ORDER Denying Defendant's 64 Motion to Stay Litigation Pending a Ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court and Denying without prejudice 64 Motion for a Protective Order. The parties shall file a stipulated protective order or a request for a protective order by 4/25/2014. The 65 Motion for Expedited Consideration is Denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC,
10
Plaintiff(s),
11
vs.
12
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
13
Defendant(s).
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:13-cv-01689-APG-NJK
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
STAY AND MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
(Docket No. 64, 65)

15

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay litigation pending a ruling from the

16

Nevada Supreme Court. See Docket No. 64. The discovery cut-off in this case is currently April 30,

17

2014. See Docket No. 62. The Court finds that good cause does not exist to stay discovery at this late

18

date. Accordingly, as it relates to discovery, the motion to stay is hereby DENIED. With respect to

19

subsequent deadlines, including the deadline to file dispositive motions, the motion is DENIED without

20

prejudice. If Defendant seeks a stay of subsequent deadlines, it may file a renewed motion focused

21

specifically on argument as to why vacating those deadlines is appropriate.

22

Also pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for a protective order. See Docket No. 64.

23

Generally, parties stipulate to a protective order and the Court believes they should be able to do so in

24

this case. Accordingly, the pending motion for a protective order is DENIED without prejudice. The

25

Court ORDERS the parties to immediately confer regarding a stipulated protective order. The parties

26

shall file a stipulated protective order or a request for a protective order outlining any disputes related

27

thereto, no later than April 25, 2014.

28

1
2

Lastly, in light of the above, the motion for expedited consideration (Docket No. 65) is hereby
DENIED as moot.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

DATED: April 22, 2014

5
6

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2