Bates et al v. Dollar Loan Center, LLC et al
Filing
190
ORDER that granting 188 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Class Claims is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 182 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Opposition to Plaintiff Sharon Pratt's Motion for Class Certification is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/9/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
PASQUAIL BATES, et al.,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
10
Case No. 2:13-CV-1731-KJD-CWH
v.
ORDER
DOLLAR LOAN CENTER, LLC, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
Before the Court is Plaintiff Sharon Pratt’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Her Class
15
Claims (#188). Defendants have responded in non-opposition (#189). The motion to dismiss
16
appears to be the result of new facts illustrating that Pratt cannot serve as a class representative.
17
To be clear, Pratt seeks to preserve her individual claims, while voluntarily dismissing her class
18
claims.
19
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) governs the voluntary dismissal of class actions
20
and requires court approval. However, by its terms, Rule 23(e) applies only to “certified
21
class[es].” There is no certified class here. Thus, this motion for voluntary dismissal is governed
22
by Rule 41. Because Defendants have answered and filed motions for summary judgment,
23
dismissal requires a court order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). However, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2),
24
the Court finds dismissal proper.
25
///
26
///
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff Pratt’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss her Class Claims (#188) is
2
HEREBY GRANTED. Further, Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Opposition
3
to Plaintiff Sharon Pratt’s Motion for Class Certification (#182) is HEREBY DENIED as moot.
4
5
DATED this 9th day of December 2014.
6
7
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?