Turner v. High Desert State Prison et al

Filing 16

ORDER Denying 4 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , and 13 Plaintiff's Motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff a printout of the current CM/ECF docket in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit no further motions or documents during the 90-day mediation stay. Plaintiff is hereby cautioned that any motions or documents filed during this stay will be stricken as fugitive documents. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/14/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: plaintiff - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 JOHN TURNER, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / Case No. 2:13-cv-01740-JAD-VCF ORDER 15 16 This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a state 17 prisoner. On January 10, 2014, the court entered an order screening the complaint and imposing a 18 90-day mediation stay. (Doc. 14). The screening order specified that: “During this ninety-day stay 19 period, no other pleadings or papers shall be filed in this case, and the parties shall not engage in any 20 discovery.” (Doc. 14, at p. 4). 21 Plaintiff has filed several motions in this action. Plaintiff has filed a motion entitled “motion 22 for legal question.” (Doc. 4). Plaintiff is hereby informed that the Court is unable to give legal 23 advice to litigants. 24 25 26 Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 7). Plaintiff’s motion is premature and is denied without prejudice on that basis. Plaintiff has filed a motion for forms. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff claims to need the forms for his 1 complaint. (Id.). The court has screened the complaint and allowed the complaint to proceed. The 2 forms that plaintiff seeks are not required for a federal civil rights complaint. Moreover, the Court 3 suspects that the forms sought by plaintiff are not federal complaint forms, because they do not 4 correspond to any form numbers of which this Court is aware. Plaintiff’s motion for forms is denied. 5 Plaintiff has filed a motion to enter a “Rule 409" grievance concerning funds in his prison 6 inmate account. (Doc. 10). Apparently plaintiff’s motion refers to Nevada Department of 7 Corrections Administrative Regulation 409. Plaintiff’s motion is denied as inappropriate. To the 8 extent that plaintiff seeks to file a grievance within the prison system concerning funds in his inmate 9 account, he may do so by contacting the appropriate Department of Corrections officials. 10 Plaintiff has filed a “motion to file and admit documents.” (Doc. 11). First, there are no 11 documents attached to plaintiff’s motion. Second, the Court does not require the submission of 12 evidence at this juncture. Plaintiff’s motion is denied. 13 Plaintiff has filed a motion for discovery. (Doc. 13). Plaintiff’s motion does not pertain to 14 discovery and is not a motion to compel. Further, the screening order specifies that no discovery 15 proceedings may take place until the 90-day stay has expired. Plaintiff’s motion is denied. 16 However, to the extent that plaintiff’s motion seeks a copy of the docket in this action, the Court will 17 direct the Clerk of Court to send plaintiff a current docket printout. 18 19 20 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions at Doc. 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 13 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL SEND plaintiff a printout of the current CM/ECF docket in this case. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit no further motions or 23 documents during the 90-day mediation stay. Plaintiff is hereby cautioned that any motions or 24 documents filed during this stay will be stricken as fugitive documents. 25 Dated this 14th day of January, 2014. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?