Smart City Holdings, LLC et al v. Shownets, LLC et al

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 21 Emergency MOTION to Expedite Discovery in Connection with Preliminary Injunction Motion filed by Smart City Holdings, LLC, Smart City Networks, L.P. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery conducted in this matter shall be governed by a protective order regarding the dissemination of confidential and highly confidential/attorneys eyes only information. The parties shall expeditiously submit a stipulated proposed protective order to the Court for approval. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SMART CITY HOLDINGS, LLC, and SMART CITY NETWORKS, L.P., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) SHOWNETS, LLC; and SCOTT NUSSBAUM, ) ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No.: 2:13-cv-01751-GMN-GWF ORDER Emergency Motion for Expedited Discovery (#21) 13 14 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Expedited Discovery in 15 Connection with Preliminary Injunction Motion (#21), filed on September 27, 2013 and Defendant 16 Shownets, LLC’s Response to Motion for Expedited Discovery in Connection with Preliminary 17 Injunction Motion (#28), filed on October 2, 2013. The Court conducted a hearing in this matter on 18 October 2, 2013. 19 The parties are in agreement that both Plaintiffs and Defendants should be permitted to 20 conduct expedited discovery relating to the issues to be adjudicated in regard to Plaintiffs’ motion 21 for preliminary injunction. The parties also agree that a stipulated protective order governing the 22 disclosure of confidential and highly confidential/“attorney’s eyes only” information should be 23 entered. The parties also wish to preserve the current preliminary injunction hearing date of 24 October 10, 2013 and believe that necessary documentary and deposition discovery can be 25 completed prior to the hearing date. The parties and the Court discussed and agreed upon the 26 relevant categories of discovery during the hearing. Accordingly, 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Expedited Discovery in Connection with Preliminary Injunction Motion (#21) is granted in accordance with the 1 foregoing statements and the relevant categories of discovery as discussed and agreed upon during 2 the hearing. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery conducted in this matter shall be governed by 4 a protective order regarding the dissemination of confidential and highly confidential/“attorney’s 5 eyes only” information. The parties shall expeditiously submit a stipulated proposed protective 6 order to the Court for approval. 7 DATED this 2nd day of October, 2013. 8 9 10 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?