Smart City Holdings, LLC et al v. Shownets, LLC et al
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 21 Emergency MOTION to Expedite Discovery in Connection with Preliminary Injunction Motion filed by Smart City Holdings, LLC, Smart City Networks, L.P. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery conducted in this matter shall be governed by a protective order regarding the dissemination of confidential and highly confidential/attorneys eyes only information. The parties shall expeditiously submit a stipulated proposed protective order to the Court for approval. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
SMART CITY HOLDINGS, LLC, and SMART
CITY NETWORKS, L.P.,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SHOWNETS, LLC; and SCOTT NUSSBAUM,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No.: 2:13-cv-01751-GMN-GWF
ORDER
Emergency Motion for Expedited
Discovery (#21)
13
14
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Expedited Discovery in
15
Connection with Preliminary Injunction Motion (#21), filed on September 27, 2013 and Defendant
16
Shownets, LLC’s Response to Motion for Expedited Discovery in Connection with Preliminary
17
Injunction Motion (#28), filed on October 2, 2013. The Court conducted a hearing in this matter on
18
October 2, 2013.
19
The parties are in agreement that both Plaintiffs and Defendants should be permitted to
20
conduct expedited discovery relating to the issues to be adjudicated in regard to Plaintiffs’ motion
21
for preliminary injunction. The parties also agree that a stipulated protective order governing the
22
disclosure of confidential and highly confidential/“attorney’s eyes only” information should be
23
entered. The parties also wish to preserve the current preliminary injunction hearing date of
24
October 10, 2013 and believe that necessary documentary and deposition discovery can be
25
completed prior to the hearing date. The parties and the Court discussed and agreed upon the
26
relevant categories of discovery during the hearing. Accordingly,
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Expedited Discovery
in Connection with Preliminary Injunction Motion (#21) is granted in accordance with the
1
foregoing statements and the relevant categories of discovery as discussed and agreed upon during
2
the hearing.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery conducted in this matter shall be governed by
4
a protective order regarding the dissemination of confidential and highly confidential/“attorney’s
5
eyes only” information. The parties shall expeditiously submit a stipulated proposed protective
6
order to the Court for approval.
7
DATED this 2nd day of October, 2013.
8
9
10
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?