Davis v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Filing 5

ORDER Accepting 4 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to the Plaintiff's ability to commence a new action in which she either pays the appropriate filing fee in full or submits a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 PENNY L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, vs. 6 7 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, 8 Defendant. 9 10 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-01774-GMN-NJK ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE NANCY J. KOPPE Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) of the Honorable Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge, entered November 5, 2013. 12 Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by November 22, 2013. No 13 objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the 14 Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s 15 Recommendation should be ACCEPTED. 16 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma 17 Pauperis is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to the Plaintiff’s ability 18 to commence a new action in which she either pays the appropriate filing fee in full or submits a 19 completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 21 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 26th day of November, 2013. 23 24 25 ________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?