Bradford v. Baker
Filing
130
ORDER Setting Deadlines for 129 Evidentiary Hearing on November 3, 2020 at 9:30 AM by videoconference. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY Document 130 Filed 07/21/20 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
*Jeremy C. Baron
Assistant Federal Public Defender
District of Columbia Bar No. 1021801
Amelia L. Bizzaro
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Wisconsin State Bar No. 145709
411 E. Bonneville Ave. Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
jeremy_baron@fd.org
amelia_bizzaro@fd.org
*Lead attorney for Petitioner Julius Bradford
11
12
U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT
D ISTRICT OF N EVADA
13
14
15
Julius Bradford,
Petitioner,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
v.
William Gittere, et al.,
Respondents.
Case No. 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY
Joint Prehearing
Scheduling Order
Case 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY Document 130 Filed 07/21/20 Page 2 of 4
1
ORDER
2
The Court has set an evidentiary hearing regarding the merits of Ground Two
3
in Mr. Bradford’s second amended petition. ECF No. 124. It is hereby ordered that
4
counsel for the parties will comply with the following prehearing procedures:
5
1.
Pre-hearing motions. No later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the
6
hearing, the parties shall file any relevant pre-hearing motions. The parties shall
7
file oppositions to pre-hearing motions no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the
8
hear-ing. The parties shall file replies in support of pre-hearing motions no later
9
than seven (7) days prior to the hearing.
10
2.
The exchange of preliminary witness and exhibit lists and evi-
11
dentiary stipulations. No later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the hearing,
12
counsel shall meet and confer either in person or by telephone and shall exchange
13
preliminary exhibit and witness lists. The preliminary witness lists shall include
14
disclosures of anticipated expert witnesses, if any, along with written reports con-
15
taining the information described in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B). The
16
parties shall also exchange (either in person or indirectly, including via email) any
17
exhibits not already possessed by opposing counsel. The parties shall also discuss
18
stipulations as to the authenticity of proposed exhibits and any anticipated eviden-
19
tiary objections.
20
3.
Meet-and-confer regarding the final witness and exhibit lists
21
and evidentiary objections. No later than sixteen (16) days prior to the hearing,
22
counsel shall again meet and confer to discuss their anticipated final witness and
23
exhibit lists and evidentiary objections.
24
4.
The final witness and exhibit lists and evidentiary objections.
25
No later than fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing, counsel shall jointly file a con-
26
solidated final list of the witnesses and exhibits to be offered jointly and/or by each
27
party. The list shall identify any evidentiary objections that may be anticipated in
2
527
Case 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY Document 130 Filed 07/21/20 Page 3 of 4
1
advance of the hearing. No party will be allowed to introduce over objection any wit-
2
ness or exhibit not listed in the final witness and exhibit list, except that a party may
3
file a supplement no later than seven (7) days prior to the hearing listing evidence in
4
response to any witness or exhibit identified for the first time in the final list. No
5
objection that may be anticipated in advance of the hearing will be preserved unless
6
raised in the final list.
7
5.
Other housekeeping matters. The hearing is currently set to be con-
8
ducted by videoconference. The Court directs the parties to jointly contact the Court-
9
room Administrator no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing to discuss
10
the logistics of the videoconference hearing. The Court anticipates the hearing may
11
take up to a full day. If counsel anticipate the hearing will run longer than one full
12
day, or if counsel have other housekeeping matters to address regarding the hearing,
13
they will discuss those issues with the Courtroom Administrator at the same time.
14
6.
Prisoner transport order and subpoenas of non-prisoner wit-
15
nesses. The hearing is currently set to be conducted by videoconference. No later
16
than fourteen (14) days before the hearing, Petitioner’s counsel will submit an order
17
directing the Nevada Department of Corrections to secure Petitioner’s attendance at
18
the videoconference hearing. Any party wishing to call any other prisoner to testify
19
shall submit a similar order by the same date. No continuance will be granted for
20
failure to secure the video attendance of Petitioner or any other prisoner unless an
21
order to compel attendance was timely sought. Similarly, no continuance will be
22
granted for failure to secure the video attendance of a non-prisoner witness who was
23
not seasonably subpoenaed.
24
7.
Pre-hearing briefs. No later than seven (7) days prior to the hearing,
25
counsel for Petitioner and for Respondents each will file a pre-hearing brief setting
26
forth the evidence and the legal arguments they expect to present at the evidentiary
27
hearing.
3
527
Case 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY Document 130 Filed 07/21/20 Page 4 of 4
1
8.
Exhibit binders. No later than seven (7) days prior to the hearing,
2
counsel for Petitioner and Respondents shall provide the Courtroom Administrator
3
with one binder or set of exhibit binders, along with an electronic copy.
4
Respectfully submitted June 24, 2020.
5
6
7
8
9
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
Aaron D. Ford
Nevada Attorney General
/s/Jeremy C. Baron
Jeremy C. Baron
Assistant Federal Public Defender
/s/Gerri Lynn Hardcastle
Gerri Lynn Hardcastle
Deputy Attorney General
10
11
ORDER
12
IT
13
IS SO ORDERED:
14
15
______________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
16
17
July 21, 2020
Dated: ________________________
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
4
527
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?