Bradford v. Baker
Filing
16
ORDER Denying 3 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Payment of filing fees due within 30 days. Granting 2 and 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed as counsel for petiti oner in place and stead of Attorney Lisa A Rasmussen. Amended Petition due within 150 days. Respondents' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance within 21 days. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/3/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: CJRA Coordinator - SLR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JULIUS BRADFORD,
Petitioner,
2:13-cv-01784-GMN-GWF
vs.
ORDER
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.
9
10
11
Following upon the submissions filed by prior state post-conviction counsel and the
Federal Public Defender,
12
IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s application (#3) to proceed in forma pauperis is
13
DENIED with respect to payment of the filing fee and that petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing
14
fee within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. The pauper application otherwise establishes
15
petitioner’s financial eligibility for appointment of counsel.
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the Court finding that the interests of justice require
17
the appointment of counsel, and further subject to payment of the filing fee, the motions (##
18
2 & 15) for appointment of counsel are GRANTED and that the Federal Public Defender's
19
Office is appointed as counsel for petitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B), with
20
Megan C. Hoffman, Esq., appearing as petitioner's counsel of record.
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Hoffman hereby is SUBSTITUTED for Ms.
22
Rasmussen as counsel of record on the docket sheet, with Ms. Rasmussen being terminated as
23
counsel on the docket sheet by this order.
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have until up to and including one
25
hundred fifty (150) days from entry of this order within which to file an amended petition
26
and/or seek other appropriate relief. Neither the foregoing deadline nor any extension thereof
27
signifies or will signify any implied finding of a basis for tolling during the time period
28
established. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal
1
limitation period and timely asserting claims. The Court will screen any amended petition filed
2
prior to ordering a response.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, so that the respondents may be electronically served
4
with any papers filed through counsel, that the Clerk shall add Attorney General Catherine
5
Cortez Masto as counsel for respondents and shall make informal electronic service of this order
6
upon respondents by directing a notice of electronic filing to her. Respondents' counsel shall
7
enter a notice of appearance within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order, but no further
8
response shall be required from respondents until further order of this Court.
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any additional state court record exhibits filed herein
10
by either petitioner or respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the
11
exhibits by number or letter. The CM/ECF attachments that are filed further shall be identified
12
by the number or numbers (or letter or letters) of the exhibits in the attachment. The hard copy
13
of any exhibits filed by either counsel shall be delivered -- for this case -- to the Clerk's
14
Office in Las Vegas.
15
The Clerk, in addition to the notices of electronic filing to Ms. Rasmussen, Ms. Hoffman,
16
and the Attorney General, shall SEND a copy of this order to the CJRA Coordinator for this
17
Division.
18
The Clerk further shall regenerate notices of electronic filing of all prior filings to the
19
Attorney General and shall regenerate notices of electronic filing for ## 1-14 to Ms. Hoffman.
20
DATED this 3rd day of December, 2013.
21
22
23
24
_________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?