Bradford v. Baker

Filing 236

ORDER granting 235 Motion for Enlargement of Time. Respondents will have until and including November 22, 2024, to file their response to Petitioner's third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/25/2024. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

JULIUS BRADFORD,

Case No. 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY

5

Petitioner,

ORDER

6

v.

7
8

JEREMY BEAN, et al.,
Respondents.

9
10

In this habeas corpus action the pro se petitioner, Julius Bradford, filed a third amended

11

habeas petition on April 2, 2024. ECF No. 227. Respondents were due to file a response to the

12

third amended petition by September 23, 2024. See ECF Nos. 229, 231, 234.

13

On August 23, 2024, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 235)

14

requesting a 60-day extension, to November 22, 2024. Respondents’ counsel states that the

15

extension of time is necessary because of the complexity of this case and their obligations in other

16

cases. The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely

17

for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time.

18

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 235)

19

is granted. Respondents will have until and including November 22, 2024, to file their response to

20

Petitioner’s third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. In all other respects, the schedule for

21

further proceedings set forth in the scheduling order entered April 11, 2024 (ECF No. 229) will

22

remain in effect.

23
24

DATED THIS 25th day of

September

, 2024.

25
26
27

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1